Judge Shigeru Oda and the Progressive Development of International Law: Opinions (declarations, Separate Opinions, Dissents) on the International Court of Justice, 1976-1992Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 15. apr. 1993 - 666 strani The present volume inaugurates a new series, "The Judges," which collects and synthesizes the opinions of leading international judges of the contemporary era who have contributed significantly to the progressive development of international law. The series is launched with the Judicial Opinions of Shigeru Oda, currently Vice President of the International Court of Justice. The collection of Opinions covers the period from Judge Oda's first election to the International Court in the Autumn of 1975, on to the year 1992. All of the individual Opinions filed by Judge Oda in this period - Separate Opinions, Declarations and Dissenting Opinions - are included, and they are published in full, without editorial cuts. An introductory essay examines the diverse educational and professional influences contributing to Judge Oda's formation as a jurist, from his earliest university years in Japan and in the United States, through his subsequent professional career in universities and government service and at international academic-scientific and diplomatic reunions over the years. The study includes a "resume "and analysis of Judge Oda's Judicial Opinions, through the cases, and attempts some identification and synthesis of the main elements in his approach to decision making and opinion writing, as well as the main strands in his judicial philosophy, as demonstrated in the actual case law. |
Vsebina
Judge Shigeru Oda and the Japanese Science of International | 1 |
Interaction of the Academic University and Professional | 18 |
The Judicial Mind and Faith of Shigeru Oda as Revealed | 29 |
Special Chambers of the Court Court Statute Article 26 | 33 |
Military and Paramilitary | 44 |
Judicial LawMaking and the | 52 |
Judicial Miscellany | 66 |
ii Review of United Nations Administrative | 72 |
119 | |
127 | |
to Intervene Judgment I C J Reports 1984 pp 90114 | 319 |
Nicaragua Nicaragua v United States of America | 453 |
EFFECT OF THE APPLICATION GIVEN TO THE VANDENBERG RESER | 457 |
iii Conclusion 4849 | 478 |
Honduras Constitution of Chamber Order of 8 May 1987 | 501 |
of the United Nations Headquarters Agreement | 527 |
v Indication of Provisional Measures Court Statute | 78 |
vii Justiciability of International Commercial | 85 |
ii | 88 |
vi | 95 |
2 | 101 |
ii The United Nations Conferences on the Law of the Sea 1921 | 647 |
THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE WATERS OF THE GULF OF FONSECA | 656 |
THE TRUE LEGAL STATUS OF THE WATERS OF THE GULF | 662 |
Biographical Note 667 | |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Judge Shigeru Oda and the Progressive Development of International Law ... Edward McWhinney Omejen predogled - 1993 |
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
1958 Convention acceptance Advisory Opinion agreement Ajdir application arbitration Article 36 Article 62 boundary Chapter claim coast coastal coastline Committee compulsory jurisdiction concept concerning Conference constitute continental shelf Court of International Court of Justice Court Statute decision Declaration delegate delimitation line dispute Dissenting Opinion draft convention effect equidistance line equidistance method equitable principles exclusive economic zone exploitation Geneva Convention Gulf of Gabes Gulf of Maine I.C.J. Reports Ibid International Court International Justice International Law Commission interpretation intervention islands Judge Oda Judgment judicial League of Nations Libya Malta median line natural prolongation negotiating text Nicaragua Oda's Opinion of Court Optional Clause outer limit paragraph parties Permanent Court present President principles and rules proposal provisions question régime Regional Office relevant rules of international sea-bed areas sedentary fisheries Separate Opinion session Shigeru ODA Special Chamber submarine areas suggested territorial sea tion Treaty Tunisia UNCLOS United Nations
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 454 - ... b. disputes with regard to matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of the United States of America as determined by the United States of America; or c. disputes arising under a multilateral treaty, unless ( 1 ) all parties to the treaty affected by the decision are also parties to the case before the Court, or (2) the United States of America specially agrees to jurisdiction...