Religion on Trial: A Handbook with Cases, Laws, and DocumentsFrom colonial times to the present, an insightful examination of how courts have determined the extent to which religion is accommodated in American public life.
This volume chronicles such groundbreaking cases as the 1991 decision ordering blood transfusions for children of Christian Scientists in Norwood Hospital v. Munoz and the infamous case, Engel v. Vitale, that banned prayer in schools and ignited calls for Chief Justice Earl Warren's impeachment. The work addresses such inflammatory contemporary disputes as prayer in schools, allegiance to the flag, and the display of religious symbols on public property, and the impact they have had on American society.
|
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–5 od 21
They believe that the act of erecting a cross or a crèche on public land does not constitute an endorsement of religion. Some proponents of this view also argue that the biblical account of Adam and Eve should be taught along with the ...
In this curious decision, a bitterly divided Court decided that the city's financing of a crèche on public land in Pawtucket, Rhode Island, was not an entanglement with religion as long as the crèche was accompanied by other traditional ...
gion as long as the crèche was accompanied by other traditional holiday decorations. The case did not settle the issue. Chapter 4 discusses another case, County of Allegheny v. Greater Pittsburgh ACLU, in which nearly identical issues ...
Dosegli ste zgornjo mejo števila strani te knjige, ki je na voljo.
Dosegli ste zgornjo mejo števila strani te knjige, ki je na voljo.