Religion on Trial: A Handbook with Cases, Laws, and DocumentsFrom colonial times to the present, an insightful examination of how courts have determined the extent to which religion is accommodated in American public life.
This volume chronicles such groundbreaking cases as the 1991 decision ordering blood transfusions for children of Christian Scientists in Norwood Hospital v. Munoz and the infamous case, Engel v. Vitale, that banned prayer in schools and ignited calls for Chief Justice Earl Warren's impeachment. The work addresses such inflammatory contemporary disputes as prayer in schools, allegiance to the flag, and the display of religious symbols on public property, and the impact they have had on American society.
|
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–5 od 43
The second half, called the Free Exercise Clause, prohibits the government from enacting laws that impinge on any individual's practice of religion. The U.S. Supreme Court has firmly established that the First Amendment protections ...
Religious leaders successfully pressed Congress in 1993 to enact the Religious Freedom Restoration Act specifically to override the Smith decision. The Smith case did not end the controversy. In another trial, City of Boerne ...
... as enacted and amended by Congress. Judges who are at least sixty-five years old and have served as active judges for a minimum of fifteen years often elect to take se- nior status. As senior judges, they may continue to hear cases, ...
Dosegli ste zgornjo mejo števila strani te knjige, ki je na voljo.
Dosegli ste zgornjo mejo števila strani te knjige, ki je na voljo.