Religion on Trial: A Handbook with Cases, Laws, and DocumentsFrom colonial times to the present, an insightful examination of how courts have determined the extent to which religion is accommodated in American public life.
This volume chronicles such groundbreaking cases as the 1991 decision ordering blood transfusions for children of Christian Scientists in Norwood Hospital v. Munoz and the infamous case, Engel v. Vitale, that banned prayer in schools and ignited calls for Chief Justice Earl Warren's impeachment. The work addresses such inflammatory contemporary disputes as prayer in schools, allegiance to the flag, and the display of religious symbols on public property, and the impact they have had on American society.
|
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–5 od 51
Stran 7
There are also differences of public opinion regarding how much government entanglement with religion is appropriate. ... Further, they argue that if the majority desires to have a public prayer or Bible reading, then those of other ...
There are also differences of public opinion regarding how much government entanglement with religion is appropriate. ... Further, they argue that if the majority desires to have a public prayer or Bible reading, then those of other ...
Stran 8
Most of the cases in Chapter 3 generated not only majority court opinions but also dissenting opinions showing that judges and Supreme Court justices—like other Americans—do not always agree on how these issues should be re- solved.
Most of the cases in Chapter 3 generated not only majority court opinions but also dissenting opinions showing that judges and Supreme Court justices—like other Americans—do not always agree on how these issues should be re- solved.
Stran 12
Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, decided to jettison the Court's compelled accommodation test—a test used to guarantee the right of religious practice. The majority opinion held that there were very few instances when a ...
Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, decided to jettison the Court's compelled accommodation test—a test used to guarantee the right of religious practice. The majority opinion held that there were very few instances when a ...
Stran 37
Dosegli ste zgornjo mejo števila strani te knjige, ki je na voljo.
Dosegli ste zgornjo mejo števila strani te knjige, ki je na voljo.
Stran 49
Dosegli ste zgornjo mejo števila strani te knjige, ki je na voljo.
Dosegli ste zgornjo mejo števila strani te knjige, ki je na voljo.
Mnenja - Napišite recenzijo
Na običajnih mestih nismo našli nobenih recenzij.
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
allow Amendment’s American antievolution applied argue Arkansas banned Bible reading blood transfusion Board of Education Bryan Catholic chief justice Christian Christmas classroom compelling Congress Court held Court of Appeals creation science crèche criminal decision display dissent district court enacted endorsement Epperson established church Establishment Clause exemptions exercise of religion faith federal Fourteenth Amendment Free Exercise Clause freedom of religion Freedom Restoration Act gion gious Gobitis hospital issue Jehovah’s Witnesses judge Lemon test liberty majority opinion ment parents parochial schools patient peyote pledge of allegiance political President prohibiting protection public schools recite the pledge refuse release-time reli religious beliefs religious exercise religious practice School District school prayer secular separation of church State’s statute substantial burden teachers teaching of evolution tion trial U.S. Constitution U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional United upheld violated the Establishment voucher wall of separation
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 198 - Virginia do enact that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, or shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief ; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities.
Stran 198 - That religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence ; and, therefore, all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience ; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love and charity towards each other.
Stran 169 - MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari in this case to...
Stran 86 - By the time of the adoption of the Constitution, our history shows that there was a widespread awareness among many Americans of the dangers of a union of Church and State. These people knew, some of them from bitter personal experience, that one of the greatest dangers to the freedom of the individual to worship in his own way lay in the Government's placing its official stamp of approval upon one particular kind of prayer or one particular form of religious services.
Stran 217 - No sectarian instruction shall be allowed in any school or institution supported in whole or in part by the public funds set apart for educational purposes...
Stran 147 - Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another.
Stran 152 - Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Bibliografski podatki
| Naslov | Religion on Trial: A Handbook with Cases, Laws, and Documents ABC-CLIO E-Books ABC-CLIO's on trial series On trial |
| Avtor | James Jurinski |
| Urednik | Charles L. Zelden |
| Izdaja | komentirana |
| Založnik | ABC-CLIO, 2004 |
| ISBN | 1851094911, 9781851094912 |
| Dolžina | 329 strani |
| Izvozi navedbo | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |