Administration Proposal Threatens First Amendment Rights of Government Grantees and Contractors: Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session, March 1, 1983U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983 - 474 strani |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
Administration agencies allocation Amendment rights American American Heart Association American Lung Association amicus curiae Appalachian Mountain Club appropriate Association authority BROOKS Chairman charitable organizations citizens Combined Federal Campaign Committee Company concerned Congress congressional contract or grant Corporation cost principles Council Defense definition of political disallowed effect employees engage in political equipment executive order federal contract federal funds Federal Government federal grant Foundation government contracts governmental decisions grant funds grant money grant or contract grants and contracts groups HORTON Internal Revenue Code issue January 24 Management and Budget ment nonprofit organizations Office of Management OMB Circular A-122 OMB proposal OMB's participate Planned Parenthood political activity political advocacy activities President private sector problem programs prohibit proposed regulations proposed revision proposed rule protected purpose receive federal recipients reimbursement restrictions salary specific staff statutory Subcommittee Thank tion unallowable voluntary Washington
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 358 - No part of the money appropriated by any enactment of Congress shall, in the absence of express authorization by Congress, be used directly or indirectly to pay for any personal service, advertisement, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter. or other device...
Stran 340 - Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.
Stran 60 - OF CHARLES A. BOWSHER COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF. THE UNITED STATES BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON LEGISLATION AND NATIONAL SECURITY COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Mr.
Stran 355 - To influence, directly or indirectly, the passage or defeat of any legislation by the Congress of the United States.
Stran 358 - Whoever, being an officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, violates or attempts to violate this section, shall be fined not more than...
Stran 379 - American Association of Community and Junior Colleges American Association of State Colleges and Universities American Council on Education Association of American Universities Association of...
Stran 375 - Honorable Jack Brooks, Chairman Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security Committee on Government Operations US House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Mr. Chairman...
Stran 336 - Of course, it is immaterial whether the beliefs sought to be advanced by association pertain to political, economic, religious or cultural matters, and state action which may have the effect of curtailing the freedom to associate is subject to the closest scrutiny.
Stran 226 - ... speaker, in such circumstances, safely could assume that anything he might say upon the general subject would not be understood by some as an invitation. In short, the supposedly clear-cut distinction between discussion, laudation, general advocacy, and solicitation puts the speaker in these circumstances wholly at the mercy of the varied understanding of his hearers and consequently of whatever inference may be drawn as to his intent and meaning. Such a distinction offers no security for free...
Stran 328 - US 88, 103 (1976) ("When the Federal Government asserts an overriding national interest as justification for a discriminatory rule which would violate the Equal Protection Clause if adopted by a State, due process requires that there be a legitimate basis for presuming that the rule was actually intended to serve that interest.").