Slike strani
PDF
ePub

ADOLPH LIPMAN, Petitioner, v. ABRAHAM, [642] GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF
SLIMMER, JR. et al. [No. 926.]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to
the Supreme Court of the State of Minne-

[blocks in formation]

NEW YORK, Petitioner, v. CHATHAM &
PHENIX NATIONAL BANK OF THE CITY
OF NEW YORK. [No. 1005.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

See same case below, 256 Fed. 90.
Mr. Frank M. Patterson for petitioner.
Mr. David L. Podell for respondent.
June 2, 1919. Denied.

MINERAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Petitioner, v. KENTUCKY COAL LANDS COMPANY. [No. 965.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

RENSSELAER & SARATOGA RAILROAD COM-
PANY, Petitioner, v. DELAWARE & HUD-
SON COMPANY, Impleaded with Roscoe
Irwin, Collector, etc. [No. 1012.]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to
the United States Circuit Court of Ap-

Messrs. J. F. Bullitt, E. L. Worthing-peals for the Second Circuit. ton, and W. B. Dixon for petitioner.

Messrs. Edward C. O'Rear, Edward E. Barthel, and Henry Fitts for respondent. June 2, 1919. Denied.

See same case below, 257 Fed. 555.
Mr. George B. Wellington for peti-
tioner.

No appearance for respondent.
June 2, 1919. Denied.

CHESTER A. SNOW, Petitioner, v. ADDIS
H. SNOW. [No. 997.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.

HARVEY D. APGAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA. [No. 1013.]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to
the United States Circuit Court of Ap-

See same case below, 48 App. D. C. 448.
Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and peals for the Fifth Circuit.
George P. Hoover for petitioner.

Mr. Henry E. Davis for respondent.
June 2, 1919. Denied.

See same case below, 255 Fed. 16.
Mr. J. C. Theus for petitioner.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Porter for respondent.

June 2, 1919. Denied.

GULF, COLORADO, & SANTA FE RAILWAY
COMPANY, Petitioner, v. MRS. E. B.
CARPENTER, Administratrix, etc. [No.
1001.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Supreme Judicial District of the State of

Texas.

See same case below, Tex. Civ. App. -, 201 S. W. 270.

Messrs. Evans Browne and J. W. Terry for petitioner.

Messrs. A. L. Curtis and Winbourn Pearce for respondent.

June 2, 1919. Denied.

PHILIP F. DU PONT et al., Petitioners, v. PIERRE S. DU PONT et al. [No. 1014.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

See same case below, 256 Fed. 129.

Messrs. William A. Glasgow, Jr., Henry P. Brown, and Robert Pennington for petitioners.

Messrs. George S. Graham and George
W. Pepper for respondents.
June 2, 1919. Denied.

SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL RAILWAY COM- GENERAL FIREPROOFING COMPANY, Peti-
PANY, Petitioner, v. CONTINENTAL &
COMMERCIAL TRUST & SAVINGS [643]
BANK and Frank H. Jones, as Trustee,
etc. [No. 1002.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

See same case below, 255 Fed. 941.
Mr. Tore Teigen for petitioner.
No appearance for respondents.
June 9, 1919. Denied.

SANTA MARINA COMPANY, Petitioner, V. CANADIAN BANK OF COMMERCE. [No. 1008.]

tioner, V. BRECKENRIDGE JONES, Trustee, etc., et al. [No. 1015.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

See same case below, 254 Fed. 970. Messrs. [644] W. K. Richardson, Charles Neave, and F. L. Chappell for petitioner.

Messrs. W. H. Dyrenforth and George A. Chritton for respondents.

June 9, 1919. Denied.

Jost DE GUZMAN et al., Petitioners, v.
FAUSTINO LICHAUCO. [No. 1016.]
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands.
Messrs. Richard Campbell and Felipe
Buencamino, Jr., for petitioners.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to
the United States Circuit Court of Ap-Browne for respondent.
peals for the Ninth Circuit.

Messrs. Alexander Britton and Evans

See same case below, 254 Fed. 391.
Mr. Edward W. McGraw for petitioner.
Messrs. Gavin McNab, Nat Schmulo-
witz and R. P. Henshall for respondent.
June 9, 1919. Denied.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Mr. E. M. Heyburn for petitioner.

Mr. M. L. Countryman for respondent.
June 9, 1919. Denied.

June 9, 1919. Denied.

LORA MCCRAY, Petitioner, v. WEST HELΕΝΑ CONSOLIDATED COMPANY. [No. 1017.]

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

See same case below, 257 Fed. 989.
Mr. Charles C. Reid for petitioner.
Mr. W. E. Hemingway for respondent.
June 9, 1919. Denied.

[blocks in formation]

June 9, 1919. Denied.

[blocks in formation]

Mr. J. J. Darlington for respondent. June 9, 1919. Denied.

CHARLES C. FOSTER, Acting Superintend-, WILLIAM P. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff in ent, etc., Petitioner, v. FRANK JOSEPH Error, v. LIBERTY OIL COMPANY et al. GOLDSOLL. [No. 1053.] [No. 439.]

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.

See same case below, 143 La. 130, 78 So. 326.

Mr. E. J. Jacquet for plaintiff in error. Mr. Harry Gamble for defendants in

error.

June 2, 1919. Dismissed per stipulation.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

June 2, 1919. Dismissed per stipulation.

ELABORATED ROOFING COMPANY OF BUFFALO, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. CHARLES S. BIRD. [No. 961.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

H. C. FERRIS and Alexander New, Receivers, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. B. F. SHANDY. [No. 740.]

State of Oklahoma.
In Error to the Supreme Court of the

June 2, 1919. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Rudolph William Lotz for [648]|[649] OHIO VALLEY ELECTRIC RAILWAY petitioners.

Messrs. William K. Richardson and Harrison F. Lyman for respondent. May 19, 1919. Petition dismissed, on motion of counsel for the petitioners.

JOHN BERNOT, Plaintiff in Error, v.
PETER MORRISON et al. [No. 1067.]
In Error to the Supreme Court of the
State of Washington.

See same case below, 81 Wash. 538, 143 Pac. 104, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 290.

No appearance for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Reese H. Voorhees, H. W. Canfield, and Henry R. Gower for defendants in error.

June 2, 1919. Docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the defendants in error.

COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. B. HALL, as Administrator, etc. [No. 761.] In Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.

See same case below, 180 Ky. 743, 203 S. W. 541.

Messrs. John F. Hager, J. W. M. Stewart, and George B. Martin for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error. June 2, 1919. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. JAMES JOHN HISSEY FOR THE USE OF JOHN A. CHAPMAN et al. [No. 462.]

Error to circuit court of appeals-Federal question.

In Error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

to review a judgment which affirmed a, ARMOUR & COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs in judgment of the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in favor of plaintiffs in a suit upon a covenant by a tenant to pay taxes.

[blocks in formation]

Mr. William Clarke Mason for defendant in error.

October 20, 1919. Per Curiam: The writ of error in this case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by § 2 of the Act of September 6. 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214).

The application, consented to by the parties, to convert nunc pro tunc the writ of error into a writ of certiorari, or to treat the writ of error as having the effect of a writ of certiorari, is also denied. See Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 728, chap. 448), § 7; Richard H. Dana, individually, v. Richard H. Dana, Executor, etc., decided October 13, 1919, post, 1203.

Error, v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN, & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY et al. [No. 175.]

Error to state court-Federal question. In Error to the Superior Court of the State of Rhode Island to review a decree affirmed by the Supreme Court of that state, sustaining a demurrer to, and dismissing, the bill in a suit to enjoin the removal of a railway spur track.

See same case below, 41 R. I. 361, 103 Atl. 1031.

Mr. Eugene A. Kingman for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. George H. Huddy, Jr., and Edward G. Buckland for defendants in er

ror.

October 20, 1919. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of

(1) Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569, 56 L. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147, 60 L. ed. 186, 187, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 97; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 58 L. ed. 1557, 1561, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep.

892.

(2) Thomas v. Iowa, 209 U. S. 258, 263, 52 L. ed. 782, 783, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 487; Bowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 664, 665, 58 L. ed. 1141, 1145, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 769; and see El Paso Sash & Door Co. v. Carraway, 245 U. S. 643, 62 L. ed. 528, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 222.

(3) Spies v. Illinois, 123 U. S. 131, 166, 31 L. ed. 80, 86, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 21, 22; Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127, 130, 45 L. ed. 119, 121, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 71.

CITY OF CHICAGO et al., Plaintiffs in

Error, V. THOMAS E. DEMPCY, as Chairman, etc., et al. [No. 90.] Error to state court-Federal questionimpairing contract obligations.

In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois to review a decree which affirmed a decree of the Circuit Court of Cook County, in that state, dismissing the bill in a suit to enjoin the enforcement of an order of the state Public Utilities Commission relative to street car operation and equipment.

See same case below, 281 Ill. 257, 117 N. E. 1010.

« PrejšnjaNaprej »