ADOLPH LIPMAN, Petitioner, v. ABRAHAM, [642] GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Petitioner, v. CHATHAM & Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See same case below, 256 Fed. 90. MINERAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Petitioner, v. KENTUCKY COAL LANDS COMPANY. [No. 965.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. RENSSELAER & SARATOGA RAILROAD COM- Messrs. J. F. Bullitt, E. L. Worthing-peals for the Second Circuit. ton, and W. B. Dixon for petitioner. Messrs. Edward C. O'Rear, Edward E. Barthel, and Henry Fitts for respondent. June 2, 1919. Denied. See same case below, 257 Fed. 555. No appearance for respondent. CHESTER A. SNOW, Petitioner, v. ADDIS Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. HARVEY D. APGAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED See same case below, 48 App. D. C. 448. Mr. Henry E. Davis for respondent. See same case below, 255 Fed. 16. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Porter for respondent. June 2, 1919. Denied. GULF, COLORADO, & SANTA FE RAILWAY Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas. See same case below, Tex. Civ. App. -, 201 S. W. 270. Messrs. Evans Browne and J. W. Terry for petitioner. Messrs. A. L. Curtis and Winbourn Pearce for respondent. June 2, 1919. Denied. PHILIP F. DU PONT et al., Petitioners, v. PIERRE S. DU PONT et al. [No. 1014.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. See same case below, 256 Fed. 129. Messrs. William A. Glasgow, Jr., Henry P. Brown, and Robert Pennington for petitioners. Messrs. George S. Graham and George SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL RAILWAY COM- GENERAL FIREPROOFING COMPANY, Peti- Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. See same case below, 255 Fed. 941. SANTA MARINA COMPANY, Petitioner, V. CANADIAN BANK OF COMMERCE. [No. 1008.] tioner, V. BRECKENRIDGE JONES, Trustee, etc., et al. [No. 1015.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. See same case below, 254 Fed. 970. Messrs. [644] W. K. Richardson, Charles Neave, and F. L. Chappell for petitioner. Messrs. W. H. Dyrenforth and George A. Chritton for respondents. June 9, 1919. Denied. Jost DE GUZMAN et al., Petitioners, v. Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to Messrs. Alexander Britton and Evans See same case below, 254 Fed. 391. Mr. E. M. Heyburn for petitioner. Mr. M. L. Countryman for respondent. June 9, 1919. Denied. LORA MCCRAY, Petitioner, v. WEST HELΕΝΑ CONSOLIDATED COMPANY. [No. 1017.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. See same case below, 257 Fed. 989. June 9, 1919. Denied. CHARLES C. FOSTER, Acting Superintend-, WILLIAM P. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff in ent, etc., Petitioner, v. FRANK JOSEPH Error, v. LIBERTY OIL COMPANY et al. GOLDSOLL. [No. 1053.] [No. 439.] In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. See same case below, 143 La. 130, 78 So. 326. Mr. E. J. Jacquet for plaintiff in error. Mr. Harry Gamble for defendants in error. June 2, 1919. Dismissed per stipulation. June 2, 1919. Dismissed per stipulation. ELABORATED ROOFING COMPANY OF BUFFALO, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. CHARLES S. BIRD. [No. 961.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. H. C. FERRIS and Alexander New, Receivers, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. B. F. SHANDY. [No. 740.] State of Oklahoma. June 2, 1919. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Rudolph William Lotz for [648]|[649] OHIO VALLEY ELECTRIC RAILWAY petitioners. Messrs. William K. Richardson and Harrison F. Lyman for respondent. May 19, 1919. Petition dismissed, on motion of counsel for the petitioners. JOHN BERNOT, Plaintiff in Error, v. See same case below, 81 Wash. 538, 143 Pac. 104, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 290. No appearance for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Reese H. Voorhees, H. W. Canfield, and Henry R. Gower for defendants in error. June 2, 1919. Docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the defendants in error. COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. B. HALL, as Administrator, etc. [No. 761.] In Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. See same case below, 180 Ky. 743, 203 S. W. 541. Messrs. John F. Hager, J. W. M. Stewart, and George B. Martin for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. June 2, 1919. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. JAMES JOHN HISSEY FOR THE USE OF JOHN A. CHAPMAN et al. [No. 462.] Error to circuit court of appeals-Federal question. In Error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit to review a judgment which affirmed a, ARMOUR & COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs in judgment of the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in favor of plaintiffs in a suit upon a covenant by a tenant to pay taxes. Mr. William Clarke Mason for defendant in error. October 20, 1919. Per Curiam: The writ of error in this case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by § 2 of the Act of September 6. 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 726, chap. 448, Comp. Stat. § 1214). The application, consented to by the parties, to convert nunc pro tunc the writ of error into a writ of certiorari, or to treat the writ of error as having the effect of a writ of certiorari, is also denied. See Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. at L. 728, chap. 448), § 7; Richard H. Dana, individually, v. Richard H. Dana, Executor, etc., decided October 13, 1919, post, 1203. Error, v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN, & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY et al. [No. 175.] Error to state court-Federal question. In Error to the Superior Court of the State of Rhode Island to review a decree affirmed by the Supreme Court of that state, sustaining a demurrer to, and dismissing, the bill in a suit to enjoin the removal of a railway spur track. See same case below, 41 R. I. 361, 103 Atl. 1031. Mr. Eugene A. Kingman for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. George H. Huddy, Jr., and Edward G. Buckland for defendants in er ror. October 20, 1919. Per Curiam: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569, 56 L. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147, 60 L. ed. 186, 187, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 97; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720, 58 L. ed. 1557, 1561, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 892. (2) Thomas v. Iowa, 209 U. S. 258, 263, 52 L. ed. 782, 783, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 487; Bowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 664, 665, 58 L. ed. 1141, 1145, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 769; and see El Paso Sash & Door Co. v. Carraway, 245 U. S. 643, 62 L. ed. 528, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 222. (3) Spies v. Illinois, 123 U. S. 131, 166, 31 L. ed. 80, 86, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 21, 22; Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127, 130, 45 L. ed. 119, 121, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 71. CITY OF CHICAGO et al., Plaintiffs in Error, V. THOMAS E. DEMPCY, as Chairman, etc., et al. [No. 90.] Error to state court-Federal questionimpairing contract obligations. In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois to review a decree which affirmed a decree of the Circuit Court of Cook County, in that state, dismissing the bill in a suit to enjoin the enforcement of an order of the state Public Utilities Commission relative to street car operation and equipment. See same case below, 281 Ill. 257, 117 N. E. 1010. |