[ Prikaz vsebine te strani ni dovoljen ]

...be certain it is this, that where there are general words in a later Act capable of reasonable and sensible application without extending them to subjects...any indication of a particular intention to do so." It was pointed out by the plaintiffs counsel that the earlier legislation may well coexist with the...

...Act are, in the language of Lord Selborne in Seward v. " Vera Cruz" (4), "capable of reasonable and sensible application without extending them to subjects specially dealt with by earlier legislation." [He also cited Crumble v. Wallsend Local Board. (5)] DAELING J. In this case it is admitted that the...

...capable of reasonable and 1908 sensible application without extending them to subjects specially R^~ dealt with by earlier legislation, you are not to hold that earlier r and special legislation indirectly repealed, altered, or derogated GOVERNfrom merely by force of...

...(1885), 10 App. Cas. 68, "that where there are general words in a later Act capable •of reasonable and sensible application without extending them to subjects...any indication of a particular intention to do so." This rule of law is expressed by the maxim, Generalia specialibus non derogant. And in Garnett v. Bradley...

...the well recognized rule applies that if the words J - A of a later Act are capable of reasonable and sensible application without extending them to subjects...earlier legislation you are not to hold that earlier or special legislation altered merely by force of such general words without any indication of a particular...

...words in a later act capable of reasonable and sensible application without extending them to a subject specially dealt with by earlier legislation, you are not to hold that ear Her and special legislation indirectly repealed, altered or derogated from, merely by force of...

...is certain it is this, that where there are general words in a later Act capable of reasonable and sensible application, without extending them to subjects...any indication of a particular intention to do so." In the earlier case of Garnett p. Bradley (1878), 3 App. Cas. 944, at 950, Lord Hatherloy bad thus...

[ Prikaz vsebine te strani ni dovoljen ]

...earlier and special legislation indirectly repealed, altered, or s. 145. derogated from merely by the force of such general words without any indication of a particular intention to do so." The difficulty arises, however, in applying it. Does the London Building Act of 1894 revoke or alter,...