INDEXES TO MINUTES OF EVIDENCE. II. THE EVIDENCE OF EACH WITNESS INDEXED SEPARATELY. NOTE.-Where a series of questions refer to the same subject, the number of the opening question only is given. ASKWITH, GEORGE RANKEN, Barrister at Law. Act done with "intent to harm" by individual: Acts of Parliament referred to by witness: Act of 1859 as to peaceful persuasion, 96, 396. Criminal Law Amendment Act 1871, 104, 143, 397. Molestation and Obstruction by Workmen Act Provident Nominations and Small Intestacies Act, 1883, 251. Trade Union Act 1871, see that title. Trade Union Amendment Act 1876, 250, 251. Allen v. Flood: Cases as to conspiracy and trade interference Cave, L. J., judgment in, 148. Civil liability, motive in relation to, effect of Distinction between this case and case of con- spiracy, made in all judgments, 900. Grantham, L. J., criticism of the House of Halsbury, Lord, dicta of, as to effects of, 130, Herschell, Lord, judgment and dicta in, 137, Inducing to strike, decision as to, 580. James, Lord, of Hereford, on doctrine of Lyons v. Wilkins, in relation to, 110, 111, 118, Macnaghten, Lord, judgment and dicta in, 153, Malicious intent, decision as to, in, 141, 150, 151, 66 'Mogul" case in relation to, 137, 521, 797, 803, Picketing, although peaceful, is a criminal Shand, L. J., judgment in, 148. Theory of facts in, importance of, and variations Watson, Lord, judgment and dicta in, 226, 523, Wright, L. J., jndgment in, 792, 797. WITNESSES' INDEX: Allen v. Flood, see that title. American cases, re conspiracy, 126, 127. Bamford v. Turnley (3 B. & S. 62), 120. Banister Brothers & Moore v. Almond ("Labour Gazette," October, 1991, 298), 121. Bayley v. The Manchester, Sheffield and Lincoln- Boots v. Grundy (1900, 82 L.T., 769), 182. Broder v. Saillard (2 Ch., D., 692, 701), 120. Bulcock v. St. Anne's Master Builders (1902, 19 Capital and Counties Bank v. Henty, 15] (page Carr v. National Amalgamated Society of House Charnock v. Court (1899, 2 Ch., 35), 116, 459. Clifford v. Brandon, 828, 829. Commissioners of Sewers v. Gellatly (1876, 3 Ch. Crocker v. Knight (1892, 61 L.J. Q.B., 466), 250, 251. Crump v. Lambert (L.R., 3 Eq. 409) 120. Denaby Collieries v. Yorkshire Miners' Associa- Duke of Bedford v. Ellis (1901, A.C., 1), 27. Giblan v. National Amalgamated Labourers' Gibson v. Lawson (1891, 2 Q.B., 545), 222, 224, Glamorganshire Coal Company v. South Wales Gregory v. Duke of Brunswick (1844 6 Man. and Hilton v. Eckersley, 819. Howden v. Yorkshire Miners' Association (1903, 72 L.J., K.B., 176), 244, 737. Huttley v. Simmons (1898, 1 Q.B., 181), 139, 181, Jenkinson v. Nield (8, T.L.R., 540), 181. ASKWITH, George Ranken-cont. Kearney v. Lloyd (26 L.R., Ir., 26, 285), 140, Keeble v. Hickereringill, 151. Kilmatigue Conspiracy Case, 185. Limpus v. The London General Omnibus Com- Linaker v. Pi'cher (17 T.L.R., 256), 24. Lumley v. Gye (2 E. & B., 216) 195, 774, 775, 776, 779, 783, 785, 787, 796. Lyons v. Wilkins, see that title. McElroa v. United Society of Drillers ("Times," McGuire v. Andrews, Reynolds, Boatman, and Mersey Docks Trustees v. Gibbs (1866, L.R., 1, Meux v. Maltby (1818) 289, 358. Mogul S.S. Company Case, see that title. Mulcahy v. Regina (1868, L.R., 3 H.L., 317), 140, O'Connell v. The Queen (11 Cl. & F., 155), 140. Poulton v. London and South Western Railway Quinn v. Leathem, see that title. Read v. Friendly Society of Operative Stone- R. v. Bauld (1876, 13 Cox, C.C., 282), 104, 106, R. v. Bunn, 603, 606. R. v. Druitt, 223, 596, 845. R. v. Eccles, 140. R. v. Hibbert (1875, 13 Cox, C.C. 82), 104. R. v. Journeymen Tailors of Cambridge, 140. R. v. Parnell and others (14 Cox, C.C, 508), 140. R. v. Selsby (1847, 5 Cox, C.C., 495), 95. R. v. Shepherd (1869, 11 Cox, C.C., 325), 102, 103. Scottish Co-operative Society v. Glasgow Fleshers Skinner v. Gunton (1 William Saunders, 23q), 649, Stevenson v. Newnham (1853, 13, C.B., 285), 150. Tallow Conspiracy Case, 184. Temperton v. Russell (1893, 1 Q.B., 435, 715), 23, Walter v. Selfe (4 De G. & S., 315), 120. Walters v. Green (1899, 2 Ch., 696), 116. Winder v. Kingston-on-Hull Corporation (1888, 20 Q.B.D.. 412), 242. Wolfe v. Matthews (1882, 21 C.D., 194), 249 Class Actions: Procedure as to, 358. Conciliation: Advantages of, 362. Ocnspiracy: Acts legal if done by one, where punished as, Allen v. Flood (1898, A.C. 1), 130, 136, 137, American cases. 126, 127. ASKWITH, George Kanken-cont. Conspiracy-cont. Cases as to-cont. Boots v. Grundy (1900, 82 L.T., 769), 182. Carr v. National Amalgamated Society of Curran v. Treleaven (1891, 2 Q.B., 547), 222, Effect of cases, 130, 136, 137, 139, 788, 789. Gibson v. Lawson (1891, 2 Q.B. 545), 222. Huttley v. Simmons (1898, 1 Q.B., 181), Kearney v. Lloyd (1890, 26 L.R., Ir.. 26. United Society of Drillers Mogul Case, see Mogul Steamship Company Mulcahy v. Regina (1868, L.R., 3 H.L. 317), Quinn v. Leathem (1901, A.C. 495), 140, R. v. Warburton (L.R.I.C.C. 276), 140. Skinner v. Gunton (1 William Saunders Civil liability in: American Cases as to, 127, 128. Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act Liability for civil conspiracy first con- How far indictable as, 813. To commit a tort is, 650. Suggested no reason why this principle To molest, ruling as to, 598, 602. Allen v. Flood as to, 148, 151. Bulcock v. St. Anne's Master Builders Carr v. National Amalgamated Society of Temperton v. Russell (1893) as to, 148, 150. Conspiracy to injure, see that title. Definition of, 140, 488, 496, 499. Desires of Trade Unions as to change of law of, Difficulty and uncertainty of the law, and conflict Effect of cases on: Gist of the action in, 646, Dicta of Lord Halsbury on, 130, 136, 137. Intimidation under, 222. Definition of, by Mr. Chalmers-Hunt, 223. Is of general application, 437. Objects of the Act, 237, 642. 66 Peaceful persuasion " not allowed under, 104, Words as to, why left out in the Act, 104. Section 7, as to Watching and Besetting, 407. Cases as to, 225, 237, 251, 901. Gregory v. Duke of Brunswick, 139, 140, Quinn v. Leathem, doctrine as to in, 151, Existence and effects of, 893. Macnaghten, Lord, on, 140, 533, 542, 827. Employers' Associations, statement showing Extract from Industrial Democracy, by Mr. and Proposed legislation re Trade Unions : Letter addressed to Members of Parliament Chart showing number of work-people Trade Unions : Attitude of, with regard to the existing Expenditure of, 1893-1902, chart showing Membership of, in 1902, statement sum- Bayley v. Manchester, Sheffield and Lincoln- Briscoe v. Meakin, 4979. Carr v. National Amalgamated Society of Duke of Bedford v. Ellis, 27. Linaker v. Pilcher, 24. Lyons v. Wilkins, 24. Temperton v. Russell, 23, 27, 276, 299. Temperton, v. Russell, 25, 27, 276, 287, 299. Employer and workmen, position as to, com- How suable apart from special Trade Union law Inability to sue its own agents, 61, 73. Members of, not personally liable, 385, 391, 673. Poyal Commission on Labour 1891-4, as to, 23, Royal Commission on Trade Unions 1867-9, as to, Rules of Trade Unions in relation to: How far affecting liability, 695, 712, 714, Possibility of framing so as to exclude Trade Union Congress in 1875, on, 42. Views of witness as to, 47, 49, 52. Lyons v. Wilkins: ((1) 1896, 1 Ch. 811, 832; (2) 1899 Combination to prevent one man from working Head Note in, 110. Legality of strikes : Dictum by Kay, L. J., 222, 584. Dictum by Lindley, M.R., 158, 595. Liability of Trade Unions not argued in, 24. Peaceful persuasion, decision as to, 110, 111, 113, First declared illegal in, 114. Remedy in, followed in other cases, 121. Sympathetic strikes, illegality of, judgment of ASKWITH, George Ranken-cont. Effect of on otherwise lawful act, 515. Mogul Steamship Company Case (1892, AC., 25): Combination in furtherance of labour decision as Chalmers-Hunt, Mr. on, 175. "Dicta" in criticised, 790. Difficulties in, law as to, views of witness as to, Advantage of Statutory over Common Law, Cairns, Lord Chancellor, as to in 1875, 104. Banister Brothers and Moore v. Almond and Charnock v. Court (1899), 116, 459. Judgment in, Witness's view of, 111. R. v. Selsby (1847), 95. R. v. Shepherd (1869), 102, 103 Quoted in Commons Debate by Mr. Russell Gurney's charge in, 104. Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1871, as to, 104. Intention of the Conspiracy and Protection of Opinions in 1895 as to legality of, 110. Royal Commission on Labour 1891-4, witnesses What it is in practice, 415, 435. When indictable as nuisance at Common Law, 118, 119, 464. Words as to why left out in Act of 1875, 104. Proposed Legislation re Trade Unions : Acts legal when done by one person, not to be Copies of Bills handed in, 86. Peaceful Persuasion, proposals as to, 90. Webb, Mr. and Mrs. Sidney, draft bill as to, 87. Qualifications of Witness, 1. ASKWITH, George Ranken-cont. Quinn v. Leathem (1901), A.C. 495): America, use made of the doctrines of in, 126. Not affected by Trade Union Act of 1871, Not affected by Conspiracy and Pro- Conspiracy to injure," doctrine of, 151, 152, 155, Directions given to the Jury by Fitz Gibbon, L.J., Facts in, 151 (page 18), 152. Haldane. Mr., article comparing Quinn v. Lindley, Lord, judgment and dicta in, 140, 181, 217, 231, 232, 237, 527, 529, 608, 800, 926, 931. Royal Commission of 1874-5 on Master and Servants Principle on which Conspiracy and Protection of Tort committed by combination of persons, a Royal Commission on Labour 1891-4: Arbitration and Conciliation, observations as to Agreements should be binding, 372. Incorporation of Trade Unions, proposals as to, Intimidation, report on, 223, 224, 458. Peaceful Persuasion, evidence as to, 110. Arbitration and Conciliation, observations as to, Incorporation of Trade Unions, suggestion as to Legality of Trade Unions and of Strikes, Report Tort committed in pursuance of combination, Societies: How far suable by representatives, 289 Strikes : Legality of: Dictum of Kay, L. J., as to, 222, 584. Dictum of Lindley M. R., 158, 595. Royal Commission on Trade Unions 1867-9, Limitation on the conduct of, 595. Non-Unionists, strikes against, views as to Right of workmen to strike, 571, 575. Statistics re Strikes and Lock-outs, summary of, Subscriptions to strikes by outsiders, question as Sympathetic strikes, views as to, 222, 226, 235 Taff Vale Case (1901, AC, 426.): Corollary of in conspiracy, 788, 789. Decision in, 13, 19. Grounds for, 313, 316. Points decided, 13, 653, 654, 655, 656. Effect of "registration in, 52, 53. Followed in recent cases, 27. History of, 13, 19. How far liability of Trade Union funds was argued in, 317. Chamberlain's Wharf Case (1900), 242, Duke v. Littleboy (1880), 241. Howden v. Yorkshire Miners' Association Old v. Robson (1890), 241. Wolfe v. Matthews (1882), 242. Winder v. Hull Corporation (1888), 242. Objects of, 51, 392, 397, 636, 644. Section 4, partial repeal of suggested, probabie Trade Union Act Amendment Act, 1876: Case as to--Crocker v. Knight (1892), 250, 251. Agency of: Governed by general law, 336, 331, 758. Scope of authority, discussion as to, 689, 701, Wrongful acts by Agents, difficulty in Application of, limited by rules of, 244. Segregation of, 333, 339, 349, 659, 747. Cases as to, 194, 779. Carr v. National Amalgamated Society General result of cases, 197. Wales Miners' Federation, 180, 781. McElrea v. United Society of Drillers (1904), 200. McGuire v. Andrews, Reynolds, Boat- Dicta of Lord Halsbury in, 130, 136. Rogers v. Rajendro Dutt, 194. |