National Government, and the war powers under the Constitution, is to be found in the platforms of the great political parties, in the messages and action of the Executive, and the action of the several departments of the Government, the speeches of leading statesmen, and resolutions of public meetings.

The platform of the Republican party, on which President. Lincoln was elected, contained this resolution:

"Resolved, That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States; and especially the right of each State to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is essential to the balance of power on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depend, and we denounce the lawless invasion by armed force of the soil of any State or Territory, no matter under what pretext, as among the gravest crimes."

Democratic resolutions, beginning in 1840, and continuing to 1860, were repetitions of the following:

"Resolved, That Congress has no power under the Constitution to interfere with or control the domestic institutions of the several States," etc.

The ancient and long established doctrine of the Democratic party in relation to slavery was expressed in the Cincinnati Platform in 1856, as follows: "That Congress has no power under the Constitution to interfere with, or control the domestic institutions of the several States, and that all such States are the sole and proper judges of everything appertaining to their affairs not prohibited by the Constitution."

The Attorney General of the United States, Judge Black, in an official opinion dated November 20, 1860, (being about two weeks after Mr. Lincoln's election, and presented to the Cabinet of President Buchanan,) declares in substance, that war made by Congress upon a seceding State would dissolve the Union, and thus legalize secession. His words are:

"If it be true that war cannot be declared, nor a system of general hostilities carried on by the central Government against a State, (as he

had previously attempted to show,) then it seems to follow that an attempt to do so would be ipso facto an expulsion of such State from the Union; being treated as an alien and an enemy, she would be compelled to act accordingly. And if Congress shall break up the present Union by unconstitutionally putting strife and enmity between different sections of the country, instead of the domestic tranquility which the Constitution was meant to insure, will not all the States be absolved from their Federal obligations? Is any portion of the people bound to contribute their money or their blood to carry on a contest like that?"

President Buchanan, in his Message of December 3, 1860,

says:

"The question fairly stated is: Has the Constitution delegated to Congress the right to coerce a State into submission, which is attempting to withdraw, or has actually withdrawn from the Confederacy? If answered in the affirmative it must be upon the principle that power has been conferred upon Congress to declare or to make war upon a State. After much serious reflection, I have arrived at the conclusion that no such power has been delegated to Congress or to any other department of the Federal Government. Without descending to particulars, it may be safely asserted that the power to make war against a State is at variance with the whole spirit of the Constitution. * * * Congress possesses many means of preserving it, (the Union,) by conciliation, but the sword was not placed in their hands to preserve it by force."

*

*

*

*

It was resolved by Congress in 1861, by a nearly unanimous vote, "That neither the Federal Government nor the people, or the Governments of the non-slaveholding States, have the right to legislate upon or interfere with slavery in any of the slaveholding States of the Union."

On the 14th of January, 1861, Mr. Corwin, Chairman of a Select Committee of thirty-three, reported a series of propositions to the House of Representatives, the first of which was adopted in the form of a Joint Resolution by a vote of 137 to 53, in the House, and was subsequently passed by the Senate, contained the following:

"Resolved, That it is the duty of the Federal Government to enforce the Federal laws, protect the Federal property and preserve the Union of these States.

"Resolved, That we recognize slavery as now existing in fifteen of the United States by the usages and laws of those States, and we recognize no authority legally or otherwise, outside of a State where it so exists, to interfere with slaves or slavery in such States, in disregard of the rights of their owners or the peace of society."

The following resolutions passed the United States House of Representatives, February 11th, 1861, 116 yeas, 4 nays:

"Resolved, That neither the Federal Government nor the people, nor Governments of the non-slaveholding States have a purpose or a Constitutional right to legislate upon or interfere with slavery in any of the States of the Union.

"Resolved, That those persons in the North who do not subscribe to the foregoing propositions are too insignificant in numbers and influence to excite the serious attention or alarm of any portion of the people of the Republic; and that the increase of their numbers and influence does not keep pace with the increase of the aggregate population of the Union."

On the 28th of February, 1861, a Joint Resolution was passed, 133 to 65, providing for an amendment of the Constitution, as follows:

"ART. 12. No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which shall authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or to interfere within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State."

Abraham Lincoln, in his Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861, says: "I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."

President Lincoln again says in his Inaugural Address of March 4th, 1861: "I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution, which amendment, however, I have not seen, has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States including that of persons held to service. To avoid misconstruction of what I have said, I depart from my purpose not to speak of particular amendments so far as to say that,

n

holding such a provision now to be implied Constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable."

I have already in this volume detailed the action of the military leaders early in the war, in regard to slavery. They were very slow, as we have seen, to assert belligerent rights against the slaveholders. For a time they would not permit any interference with slaves or slavery; and the strange, almost incredible spectacle was presented, of the Nation's attempting to carry on war against the slaveholding Confederacy, refusing to accept the loyal services of a very considerable portion of the people of the Confederacy because they were black, and for a time, many officers of the army, not only refused to accept such service, but actually used the Federal army to return loyal men to the rebel authorities, to be used in strengthening the power of the insurgents.

After actual war had been commenced by the insurgents, after the Confederate Government had been established, Mr. Seward, Secretary of State, on the 10th of April, 1861, thus writes to Charles F. Adams, our Minister to England: *

"For these reasons he (the President) would not be disposed to reject a cardinal dogma of theirs (the secessionists), namely: that the Federal Government could not reduce the seceding States to obedience by conquest, even though he were disposed to question that proposition. But in fact the President willingly adopts it as true. Only an imperial or despotic Government could subjugate thoroughly disaffected and insurrectionary members of the State. This Federal Republican system is, of all forms of Government, the very one which is most unfitted for such a labor. Happily, however, this is only an imaginary defect. The system has within itself adequate, peaceful, and recuperative forces. Firmness on the part of the Government in maintaining and preserving the public institutions and property, and in executing the laws where authority can be exercised without waging war, combined with such measures of justice, moderation and forbearance as will disarm reasoning opposition, will be sufficient to secure the public safety, until returning reflection, concurring with the fearful experience of social evils, the inevitable fruits of faction, shall bring the recreant members cheerfully back into the family, which, after all, must prove their best and

Diplomatic Correspondence of 1861.

happiest, as it undeniably is, their most natural home. The Constitution of the United States provides for that return, by authorizing Congress, on application to be made by a certain majority of States, to assemble a National Convention, in which the organic law can, if needful, be revised so as to remove all real obstacles to a reunion so suitable to the habits of the people, and so eminently conducive to the common safety and welfare. Keeping that remedy steadily in view, the President, on one hand, will not suffer the Federal authority to fall into abeyance; nor will he, on the other, aggravate existing evils by attempts at coercion, which must assume the form of direct war against any of the revolutionary States. If, while he is pursuing this course, 'commended as it is by prudence and by patriotism, the scourge of civil war, for the first time in our history, must fall upon our country during the term of his administration, that calamity will then have come, through the agency, not of the Government, but of those who shall have chosen to be its armed, open, and irreconcilable enemies; and he will not suffer himself to doubt that, when the value of the imperilled Union shall be brought in that fearful manner home to the business and bosoms of the American people, they will, with an unanimity that shall vindicate their wisdom and their virtue, rise up and save it."

The Secretary of State writes to Mr. Adams, February 17th, 1862, as follows:

"To proclaim the crusade (against slavery) is unnecessary; and it would even be inexpedient, because it would deprive us of the needful and legitimate support of the friends of the Union who are opposed to slavery, but who prefer union with slavery, to disunion without slavery. Does France or does Great Britain want to see a social revolution here, with all its horrors, like the slave revolution in St. Domingo? Are these powers sure that the country, or the world, is ripe for such a rev olution, so that it must certainly be successful? What if, in inaugurating such a revolution, slavery, protesting against ferocity and inhumanity, should prove the victor?" *

*It is a fact worthy of note, that Mr. Seward, early in 1862, deprecating emancipation as a crusade" against slavery, asks: "Does France or does Great Britain want to see a social revolution here, with all its horrors, like the slave revolution of St. Domingo." Emancipation came, through President Lincoln, within less than a year from the date of Mr. Seward's letter, but to the credit of the long-abused negro race, let it be remembered, that it produced no “horrors," no outrages upon the part of the freedmen, upon their late masters. Mr. Lincoln, in proclaiming emancipation, had enjoined “ upon the people so declared free, to abstain from all violence (see p. 299) except in self-defense." This admonition of their benefactor they have scrupulously observed. Compare the conduct of the two classes, the