... the mere grant of such a power to Congress, did not imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power: that it is not the mere existence of such a power, but its exercise by Congress, which may be incompatible with the exercise of the same... Register of Debates in Congress - Stran 117avtor: United States. Congress - 1829Celotni ogled - O knjigi
| United States. Supreme Court - 1819 - 816 strani
...find an express prohibition : and this shows the sense of the Convention to have been, that the mere grant of a power to Congress, did not imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power. But it has .. Whene«r f the terms m never been supposed, that this concurrent power of "hg^tSdWb7... | |
| Maryland - 1831 - 256 strani
...shows the power itself, sense of the Convention to have been, that the mere grant of a require that it power to Congress, did not imply a prohibition on the States to *^f d g^iuexercise the same power. But it has never been supposed, that s iveiy by Conthis concurrent... | |
| Ohio. Supreme Court - 1832 - 976 strani
...of Sturges v. Crowninshield, (4 Wheat. 122,) one of the principles, recognised, was, that the mere grant of a power to Congress, did not imply a prohibition on the states to exercise the same power; but wherever the terms in which » power is granted to Congress, or the nature of the power required... | |
| John Marshall - 1839 - 762 strani
...find an express prohibition ; and this shows the sense of the convention to have been that the mere grant of a power to congress did not imply a prohibition on the states to exercise the same power. But it has never been supposed that this concurrent power of legislation extended to every possible... | |
| William Davis Gallagher, Otway Curry - 1839 - 438 strani
...Union, in Sturges vs. Crowningshield, 4 ffTteaton, 193. "The mere grant of a power, by Congress, does not imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power." And, in Houston vs. Moore, 5 Wheaton, 1, " The mere grant of a power, in affirmative terms to Congress,... | |
| Edward Prigg, Richard Peters - 1842 - 152 strani
...find an express prohibition ; and this shows the sense of the convention to have been that the mere grant of a power to Congress did not imply a prohibition on the states to the exercise of the same power." Again, p. 198, "It does not appear to be a violent construction of... | |
| United States - 1845 - 816 strani
...land Marbury » Midison, 1 Cranch, 137; 1 Cond. Rep. 267. The mere grant of power to Congress does not imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power. Whenever the terms in which such a power is granted to Congress require that it should be exercised... | |
| 1847 - 554 strani
...find an express prohibition ; and this shows the sense of the convention to have been, that the mere grant of a power to Congress, did not imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power. But it has never been supposed, that this concurrent power of legislation extended to every possible... | |
| 1852 - 780 strani
...to time by this court, after the most deliberate consideration, to hold that the mere grant of such a power to Congress, did not imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power; that it is not the mere existence of such a power, but its exercise by Congress, which may be incompatible... | |
| Charles Whittlesey - 1852 - 410 strani
...Union, in Sturges vs. Crowningshield, 4 Wheaton, 193. " The mere grant of a power by Congress does not imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power." And, in Houston vs. Moore, 5 Wheaton, 1, " The mere grant of a power, in affirmative terms to Congress,... | |
| |