...OF MICHIGAN. No. 130. Argued December 7, 1938.— Decided January 3, 1939. 1. Since the Twenty-First Amendment, the right of a State to prohibit or regulate...intoxicating liquor is not limited by the commerce clause. P. 394. 2. Regulation discriminatory between domestic and imported intoxicating liquors, or between...

...have no occasion to consider. For whatever its character, the law is valid. Since the Twenty-First Amendment . . . the right of a state to prohibit or...intoxicating liquor is not limited by the commerce clause . . ." 3 Although the purpose of Congress was obviously to give the States the power to protect their...

...Is valid: that the right ofastate to prohibit liquor is not limited by the commerce clause and that discrimination between domestic and Imported intoxicating...liquors, is not prohibited by the equal protection clause basing its reasons on the Twenty-first Amendment, which provides: Section 2. The transportation or...

...have no occasion to consider. For whatever its character, the law is valid. Since the twenty-first amendment * * * the right of a State to prohibit or...intoxicating liquor is not limited by the commerce clause. * * * 34 The compilations of the Marketing Laws Survey emphasize four barrier aspects of State liquor...

...this Court has twice ruled. "Since the Twenty-first Amendment, as held in the Young case [299 US 59], the right of a state to prohibit or regulate the importation...intoxicating liquor is not limited by the commerce clause." Indianapolis Brewing Co. v. Liquor Commission, 305 US 391, 394; see also Finch & Co. v. McKittrick,...

...valid: that the fight of a state to prohibit liquor is not limited by the commerce clause and that discrimination between domestic and imported intoxicating...liquors, is not prohibited by the equal protection clause basing its reasons on the Twenty-first Amendment, which provides: 'Section 2. The transportation or...

...8. Finch & Co., et al, decided January 3, 1939, the Supreme Court held that since the twenty-first amendment the right of a State to prohibit or regulate the importation of intoxicating liquors is not limited by the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution, and that discrimination...

...Brandeis stated for the court : For whatever its character, the law is valid. Since the twenty-first amendment, * * * the right of a State to prohibit...prohibited by the equal protection clause. The further claims that the law violates the due process clause is also unfounded The substantive power of the...

...Brandeis stated for the court : For whatever its character, the law is valid. Since the twenty-first amendment, * * * the right of a State to prohibit...prohibited by the equal protection clause. The further claims that the law violates the due process clause is also unfounded. The substantive power of the...

...Brandéis stated for the court : For whatever its character, the law is valid. Since the twenty-first amendment, * * * the right of a State to prohibit...liquor is not limited by the commerce clause; and » * * <jig. crimination between domestic and imported intoxicating liquors, or between imported intoxicating...