 The substantial equivalent of a thing in the sense of the patent law is the same as the thing itself, so that if two devices do the same work in substantially the same way and accomplish substantially the same result they are the same even though they...  The American Law Register - Stran 8521878Celotni ogled - O knjigi
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1879 - 784 strani
...greatly diminished, if not entirely overcome. Cahoon v. Ring, 1 Cliff. 620. Authorities concur that the substantial equivalent of a thing, in the sense...same, even though they differ in name, form, or shape. Curtis, Patents (4th ed.), sect. 310. Apply that principle to the case before court, and it is clear... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), William Henry Clifford - 1870 - 736 strani
...and accomplish substantially the same result, they are the same; and so if parts of the two machines do the same work, in substantially the same way, and accomplish substantially the same result, those parts are the same, although they may differ in name, form, or shape ; but in both cases, if... | |
 | Charles Sidney Whitman - 1871 - 734 strani
...(Morris v. Barrett, 1 Fish., 461.) If the parts of two machines, having the same mode of operation, do the same work in substantially the same way, and accomplish substantially the same result, those parts are the same, although they may differ in name, form, or shape. (Union Sugar Refinery v.... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), William Henry Clifford - 1878 - 732 strani
...reduced what he conceived to practice. Ibid. 39. If two machines, having the same mode of operation, do the same work in substantially the same way, and accomplish substantially the same result, though differing in form, shape, or name, they are the same. Ibid. 40. If the defendant's means of... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 1182 strani
...Wesiinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. New York Air-Brake Co. 11 CCA 528, 26 U. S. App. 248, 03 Fed. 902, 65 Fed. 99. The substantial equivalent of a thing, in the sense of the patent law, is the same ал the thing itself. Union Paper-Bag Mach. Co. r. Murphy, 97 US 120, 24 L. ed. 935. Mr. Justice White,... | |
 | 1926 - 1144 strani
...blower tube are directed toward predetermined parts of the boiler. Defendant's device and Bowers' device do the same work in substantially the same way, and accomplish substantially the same result. So far as the question of infringement is concerned, they may be considered the same. Machine Co. v.... | |
 | 1928 - 1134 strani
...in a different way, or produce a substantially different result. • • • Authorities concur that the substantial equivalent of a thing, in the sense...even though they differ in name, form, or shape." The references, cited in defendants' brief, Hoffman & Falk, No. 545,040, and Heidelberg, No. 620,071,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1930 - 704 strani
...same function in substantially the same way to obtain the same result. . . . Authorities concur that the substantial equivalent of a thing, in the sense...even though they differ in name, form, or shape." Machine Co. v. Murphy, 97 US 120, 125. And see Elizabeth v. Pavement Co., 97 US 126, 137. That mere... | |
 | United States. U.S. Congress. House. Committee on claims - 1936 - 292 strani
...means employed are identical or equivalent.” Ives v. Hamilton, 92 US 426. “Authorities concur that the substantial equivalent of a thing, in the sense...even though they differ in name, form., or shape.” Union v. Murphy, 97 US 120. “Though some of the corresponding parts of the machinery are not the... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Claims - 1936 - 280 strani
...means employed are identical or equivalent." Ives v. Hamilton, 92 US 42G. "Authorities concur that the substantial equivalent of a thing, in the sense...they are the same, even though they differ in name, fortn, or thape." Union v. Murphy, 97 US 120. "Though some of the corresponding parts of the machinery... | |
| |
