Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on the JudiciaryU.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 |
Vsebina
| 25 | |
| 31 | |
| 45 | |
| 74 | |
| 153 | |
| 201 | |
| 229 | |
| 256 | |
| 513 | |
| 572 | |
| 581 | |
| 613 | |
| 623 | |
| 684 | |
| 694 | |
| 697 | |
| 269 | |
| 306 | |
| 308 | |
| 327 | |
| 335 | |
| 375 | |
| 377 | |
| 413 | |
| 459 | |
| 460 | |
| 480 | |
| 709 | |
| 724 | |
| 3 | |
| 186 | |
| 322 | |
| 343 | |
| 352 | |
| 499 | |
| 528 | |
| 548 | |
| 556 | |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
accepted accreditation agencies American Gas Association ANCKER-JOHNSON ANSI antitrust approved ASME ASTM automatic damper AWWA Standard backflow prevention devices bill bimetal boiler California Chairman check valve CHUMBRIS Commission consumer cost Cross-Connection Control Department developed double check valve draft Engineering equipment evaluation Exhibit Federal Trade Commission flue Foundation fuel furnace gages gas appliances Government HAVLINA heat heater Hebel HODGDON Hydrolevel in-line industry installed interest James letter manufacturers Mechanical meeting Memphis MITCHELL National O'LEARY operation organization performance pressure principle backflow problem procedures protection question reduced pressure principle relief valve requirements Research result RYMER safety Save-Fuel screw thread Senator ABOUREZK Senator HART Sherman Act specifications SPRINGER standards-development statement stress relief subcommittee TESAR testimony tion Underwriters Laboratories unit utility vent damper Vent-O-Matic voluntary standards vote Watts Regulator welding Woolfolk Z-21 Committee
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 235 - found, to obtain injunctive relief against such other person. The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction over such actions without regard to the citizenship of the parties or the amount in controversy. The provisions of section 13(b) of the Act of September 26. 1914 (15 USC 53b) shall apply to
Stran 240 - aimed at contracts and combinations which 'by reason of intent or the inherent nature of the contemplated acts, prejudice the public interest by unduly restraining competition or unduly obstructing the course of trade.' Nash v. United States, 229 US 373, 376; United States v. Linseed Oil Co., 262 US 371, 388, 389.'"°
Stran 254 - standards boards) ASTM—American Society for Testing and Materials (purpose is promotion of knowledge of materials of engineering, and the standardization of specifications and methods of testing) ISO—International Organization for Standardization IEC—International Electrotechnical Commission COPANT—Pan American Standards Commission SPI—Society of the Plastics Industry (major national trade association of the plastics industry) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, OFFICE OF THE
Stran 66 - appears to reflect to a great extent the current procedures of the Department of Commerce National Voluntary Standards Program and the general outlines of Consumer Product Safety Commission private offerer process, as well as those of the American National Standards Institute, the American Society for Testing and Materials, and other private groups that would be subject to the act.
Stran 361 - atmosphere between the lowest opening from any pipe or faucet supplying water to a tank, plumbing fixture, or other device, and the flood rim of the receptacle. This unobstructed distance should never be less than twice the diameter of the supply pipe.
Stran 248 - Accordingly, it has been held that where a restraint upon trade or monopolization is the result of valid governmental action, as opposed to. private action, no violation of the Act can; be made out. 15 These decisions rest upon) the fact that under our form of govern-!
Stran 243 - Sherman Act does not prohibit two or more persons from associating together in an attempt to persuade Legislature or executive to take particular action with respect to a law that would produce a restraint or a monopoly. Sherman Anti-Trust Act, §§ 1, 2, 15 USCA
Stran 673 - having double valves—while even this is not "fail-safe" it substantially reduces the likelihood of this particular failure. STATEMENT OF ROGER W. SANT, ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY CONSERVATION AND ENVIRONMENT, FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION INTRODUCTION In a letter from the Chairman dated March 5, 1976, John Muller, an employee in our office, was
Stran 390 - Antitrust Questions in Voluntary Industry Standards, p. 10. Address prepared for delivery before the National Association of Manufacturers Marketing Conference (October 9, 1969)." In the original development and in all subsequent reviews of the Specifications for Backflow Prevention Devices the Foundation and the cooperating committee members have been very careful to consider the requirements of
Stran 96 - in my prepared statement. Finally, I would like to quote from a letter, dated January 26, 1973, written by the associate commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York to health directors. The letter reads as follows, in part: The "uniqueness" of the Foundation for Cross Connection Control Research approval may not