should have used.

have not hit it.

No, sir; the imitators of my style Miss Aikin has done it the best;

for she has imitated the sentiment as well as the diction.'

I intend before this work is concluded, to exhibit specimens of imitation of my friend's style in various modes; some caricaturing or mimicking it, and some formed upon it, whether intentionally or with a degree of similarity to it, of which, perhaps, the writers were not conscious.

In Baretti's Review, which he published in Italy, under the title of Frusta Letteraria, it is observed, that Dr. Robertson the historian had formed his style upon that of Il celebre Samuele Johnson.' My friend himself was of that opinion; for he once said to me, in a pleasant humour: Sir, if Robertson's style be faulty, he owes it to me; that is, having too many words, and those too big ones.'

I read to him a letter which Lord Monboddo had written to me, containing some critical remarks upon the style of his Journey to the Western Islands of Scotland. His Lordship praised the very fine passage upon landing at Icolmkill; but his own style being

1

1'We were now treading that illustrious island, which was once the luminary of the Caledonian regions, whence savage clans and roving barbarians_derived the benefits of knowledge, and the blessings of religion. To abstract the mind from all local emotion would be im possible, if it were endeavoured, and would be foolish, if it were possible. Whatever withdraws us from the power of our senses, whatever makes the past, the distant, or the future, predominate over the present, advances us in the dignity of thinking beings. Far from me, and from my friends, be such frigid philosophy, as may conduct us, indifferent and unmoved, over any ground which has been dignified by wisdom, bravery, or virtue. The man is little to be envied, whose patriotism would not gain force upon the plain of Marathon, or whose piety would not grow warmer among the ruins of Iona.'

Had our tour produced nothing else but this sublime passage, the world must have acknowledged that it was not made in vain. Sir

66

exceedingly dry and hard, he disapproved of the richness of Johnson's language, and of his frequent use of metaphorical expressions. JOHNSON: Why, sir, this criticism would be just if, in my style, superfluous words, or words too big for the thoughts, could be pointed out; but this I do not believe can be done. For instance, in the passage which Lord Monboddo admires, We were now treading that illustrious region," the word illustrious contributes nothing to the mere narration; for the fact might be told without it; but it is not, therefore, superfluous; for it wakes the mind to peculiar attention, where something of more than usual importance is to be presented. "Illustrious!"-for what? and then the sentence proceeds to expand the circumstances connected with Iona. And, sir, as to metaphorical expression, that is a great excellence in style, when it is used with propriety, for it gives you two ideas for one;-conveys the meaning more luminously, and generally with a perception of delight.'

He told me that he had been asked to undertake the new edition of the Biographia Britannica, but had declined it; which he afterwards said to me he regretted. In this regret many will join, because it would have procured us more of Johnson's most delightful species of writing; and although my friend Dr. Kippis1 has hitherto discharged the task judici

Joseph Banks, the present respectable President of the Royal Society, told me, he was so much struck on reading it, that he clasped his hands together, and remained for some time in an attitude of silent admiration.

1[After having given to the public the first five volumes of a new edition of Biographia Britannica, between the years 1778 and 1793, Dr. Kippis died, October 8, 1795; and the work is not likely to be soon completed.-M.]

ously, distinctly, and with more impartiality than might have been expected from a Separatist, it were to have been wished that the superintendence of this literary Temple of Fame had been assigned to 'a friend of the constitution in Church and State.' We should not then have had it too much crowded with obscure dissenting teachers, doubtless men of merit and worth, but not quite to be numbered amongst 'the most eminent persons who have flourished in Great Britain and Ireland.'1

On Saturday, September 20, after breakfast, when Taylor was gone out to his farm, Dr. Johnson and I

1 In this censure, which has been carelessly uttered, I carelessly joined. But in justice to Dr. Kippis, who, with that manly, candid good temper which marks his character, set me right, I now with pleasure retract it: and I desire it may be particularly observed, as pointed out by him to me, that 'The new lives of dissenting divines, in the first four volumes of the second edition of the Biographia Britannica, are those of John Abernethy; Thomas Amory; George Benson; Hugh Broughton, the learned Puritan; Simon Browne Joseph Boyse of Dublin; Thomas Cartwright, the learned Puritan ; and Samuel Chandler. The only doubt I have ever heard suggested is, whether there should have been an article of Dr. Amory. But I was convinced, and am still convinced, that he was entitled to one, from the reality of his learning, and the excellent and candid nature of his practical writings.

The new lives of clergymen of the Church of England, in the same four volumes, are as follows: John Balguy; Edward Bentham ; George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne; William Berriman; Thomas Birch; William Borlase; Thomas Bott; James Bradley; Thomas Broughton; John Brown; John Burton; Joseph Butler, Bishop of Durham; Thomas Carte; Edmund Castell; Edmund Chishull; Charles Churchilll; William Clarke; Robert Clayton, Bishop of Clogher; John Conybeare, Bishop of Bristol; George Costard; and Samuel Croxall. -"I am not conscious (says Kippis) of any partiality in conducting the work. I would not willingly insert a dissenting minister that does not justly deserve to be noticed, or omit an established clergyman that does. At the same time, I shall not be deterred from introducing dissenters into the Biographia, when I am satisfied that they are entitled to that distinction, from their writings, learning, and merit."'

Let me add that the expression 'A friend to the constitution in Church and State,' was not meant by me as any reflection upon this reverend gentleman, as if he were an enemy to the political constitution of his country, as established at the Revolution, but, from my steady and avowed predilection for a Tory, was quoted from Johnson's Dictionary, where that distinction is so defined.

VOL. IV.

M

had a serious conversation, by ourselves, on melancholy and madness; which he was, I always thought, erroneously inclined to confound together. Melancholy, like 'great wit,' may be 'near allied to madness'; but there is, in my opinion, a distinct separation between them. When he talked of madness, he was to be understood as speaking of those who were in any great degree disturbed, or, as it is commonly expressed, 'troubled in mind.' Some of the ancient philosophers held, that all deviations from right reason were madness; and whoever wishes to see the opinions both of ancients and moderns upon this subject, collected and illustrated with a variety of curious facts, may read Dr. Arnold's very entertaining work.1

Johnson said, 'A madman loves to be with people whom he fears; not as a dog fears the lash; but of whom he stands in awe.' I was struck with the justness of this observation. To be with those of whom a person, whose mind is wavering and dejected, stands in awe, represses and composes an uneasy tumult of spirits, and consoles him with the contemplation of something steady, and at least comparatively great.

2

He added, 'Madmen are all sensual in the lower stages of the distemper. They are eager for gratifications to soothe their minds, and divert their attention from the misery which they suffer: but when they grow very ill, pleasure is too weak for them, and they seek for pain. Employment, sir, and hardships, pre

1 Observations on Insanity, by Thomas Arnold, M.D., London, 1782.

2 [Cardan composed his mind, tending to madness (or rather actually mad, for such he seems in his writings, learned as they are), by exciting voluntary pain. V. Card. Op. et Vit.-K.]

8 We read in the Gospels, that those unfortunate persons who were possessed with evil spirits (which, after all, I think, is the most prob.