Lake Michigan Water Divrsion. Hearings ... on H.R. 3192, 3193, 3194, 3195, 3196, 3197, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3211, 3212, 3213, 3214, and 33001953 - 155 strani |
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
addition to domestic additional diversion annual average Army engineers attorney authorized Beardstown bills Canada Chairman channel Chicago drainage canal Chicago River city of Chicago Colonel MILNE commerce Congress Congressman control the lake Corps of Engineers cubic feet damage discharge District of Chicago diversion at Chicago diversion of water domestic pumpage DONDERO downstate effect effluent Federal feet per second flood flow Government hearings high water Illinois River Illinois Waterway improvement inches increase in diversion increased diversion interests International Joint Commission jurisdiction Lake Erie lake levels Lake Michigan Lake Superior Lakes Michigan-Huron Lawrence legislation level of Lake Lockport lower MACHROWICZ Mayor TILLITT Meserow miles million Mississippi natural navigable capacity navigable waters Niagara River Ohio OLIS oxygen percent plants ports problem question recommended regulation riparian Sanitary District second-feet Secretary sion Special Master STANLEY statement stream tons United States Supreme water diversion water from Lake water levels watershed Wisconsin
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 104 - ... flowing from streets and sewers and passing therefrom in a liquid state...
Stran 57 - It is agreed that, in addition to the uses, obstructions, and diversions heretofore permitted or hereafter provided for by special agreement between the parties hereto, no further or other uses or obstructions or diversions, whether temporary or permanent, of boundary waters on either side of the line...
Stran 107 - If the end be legitimate and within the scope of the Constitution, all the means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, and which are not prohibited, may constitutionally be employed to carry it into effect.
Stran 105 - The language of the Constitution, as has been well said, could not be understood without reference to the common law. 1 Kent Com. 336 ; Bradley, J., in Moore v. United States, 91 US 270, 274.