United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Količina 466United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1986 |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
action agents alleged amici curiae anesthesiologists application arbitration argued the cause Arizona Supreme Court arrest Assn Attorney BCBR bench trial BRENNAN brief C. A. 5th Cir cert Certiorari denied challenge charge claim Clause Commission concluded concurring conduct Congress constitutional conviction Corp counsel Court of Appeals criminal curiam decision defendant determine dissenting 466 U. S. District Court double jeopardy EEOC effect employees enforcement evidence expectation of privacy fact federal filed Fourteenth Amendments Fourth Amendment granted habeas Helicol hospital issue judge judgment judicial immunity jurisdiction jury JUSTICE JUSTICE BRENNAN liability limit license Lydon MARSHALL Medicare ment open fields doctrine Opinion parties petition petitioner petitioner's police procedure proceedings protection question reasonable remanded Reported respondent respondent's reversed Ronwin rule Secretary Sherman Act Sixth Amendment standard statute STEVENS Supp supra Texas tion trial union United violation warrantless writ York
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 317 - [t]he underlying idea, one that is deeply ingrained in at least the Anglo-American system of jurisprudence, is that the State with all its resources and power should not be allowed to make repeated attempts to convict an individual for an alleged offense, thereby subjecting him to embarrassment, expense and ordeal and compelling him to live in a continuing state of anxiety and insecurity, as well as enhancing the possibility that even though innocent he may be found guilty.
Stran 662 - Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises...
Stran 85 - Whenever it is charged in writing under oath by a person claiming to be aggrieved, or a written charge has been filed by a member of the Commission where he has reasonable cause to believe a violation of this title has occurred...
Stran 85 - ... (1) The Board, or its duly authorized agents or agencies, shall at all reasonable times have access to, for the purpose of examination, and the right to copy any evidence of any person being investigated or proceeded against that relates to any matter under investigation or in question.
Stran 261 - US 258, 271 (1890) ("It is a general principle of construction with respect to treaties that they shall be liberally construed, so as to carry out the apparent intention of the parties to secure equality and reciprocity between them.
Stran 497 - clearly erroneous' when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
Stran 813 - Wherever the title of streets and parks may rest, they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public, and, time out of mind, have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions.
Stran 225 - It is quite plain that the Fourth Amendment governs "seizures" of the person which do not eventuate in a trip to the station house and prosecution for crime — "arrests" in traditional terminology. It must be recognized that whenever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has "seized
Stran 600 - B for any expenses incurred for items or services — (1) which are not reasonable and necessary for -the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member...
Stran 500 - The constitutional guarantees require, we think, a federal rule that prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with "actual malice" — that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.