The Queen Vs. Juan I. Jimenez: Official Report of the Examination Before the Committing Magistrate and Trial of Juan I. Jimenez for Breach of the British Foreign Enlistment Act. Before His Honor, Sir Ormond Drimmie Malcolm, Chief Justice, and a Jury in the Supreme Court of the Bahama IslandsHickok, 1898 - 70 strani |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
The Queen Vs. Juan I. Jimenez: Official Report of the Examination Before the ... Anonymous Predogled ni na voljo - 2019 |
The Queen Vs. Juan I. Jimenez: Official Report Of The Examination Before The ... Anonymous Predogled ni na voljo - 2019 |
The Queen Vs. Juan I. Jimenez: Official Report of the Examination Before the ... Anonymous Predogled ni na voljo - 2015 |
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
3rd of June A.
Q. Yes afterwards armed arrested arrive at Monte arrived at Inagua asked ATTORNEY baggage Bahama Islands beach board at Cape board at Inagua board the Fanita boat Cape Hayti captain captain told cartridges charge Chief Justice Chris Christopher Roberts Circuit Magistrate coast coming to Inagua Court cross-examination CROSS-EXAMINED-I deck defendant's employed expedition Foreign Enlistment Act Garcia give evidence go back going to Inagua Governor's house Hayti and Monte heard Jimenez told Juan jury knew learned friend luggage Majesty's Dominions ment Mercado's evidence Monte Christy Morales morning native of San offence Paix pardoned pedition pilot at Inagua Port-de-Paix prepared to swear R. S. JOHNSTONE remember Republic of San revolver roborated S. S. Fanita S. S. Schleswig San Domingan government San Domingo Sargent saw defendant second mate ship shore statement steamer Stip sworn taken on board tell Thomen to-day troops vessel Villanueva wanted witness Mercado York
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 13 - Having heard the evidence, do you wish to '' say anything in answer to the charge ? You are not obliged to " say anything unless you desire to do so ; but whatever you say '• will be taken down in writing, and may be given in evidence '• against you at your trial.
Stran 13 - You must clearly understand that you have nothing to hope from any promise of favour and nothing to fear from any threat which may have been held out to you to induce you to make any admission or confession of guilt, but whatever you now say may be given in evidence against you upon your trial notwithstanding such promise or threat.
Stran 59 - My practice always has been to tell the jury not to convict the prisoner, unless the evidence of the accomplice be confirmed, not only as to the circumstances of the crime, but also as to the person of the prisoner...
Stran 65 - Prepares or fits out any naval or military expedition to proceed against the dominions of any friendly state, the following consequences shall ensue : (1) Every person engaged in such preparation or fitting out, or assisting therein, or employed in any capacity in such expedition...
Stran 55 - If any person within the limits of Her Majesty's dominions, and without the license of Her Majesty, — Prepares or fits out any naval or military expedition to proceed against the dominions of any friendly state...
Stran 59 - What appears to be required is, that there should be some fact deposed to, independently altogether of the evidence of the accomplice, whichj taken by itself, leads to the inference not only that a crime has been committed, but that the prisoner is implicated in it.
Stran 59 - ... and Cresswell, J., added, 'You may take it for granted that the accomplice was present at the committal of the offence, and may be corroborated as to the facts; but that has no tendency to show that the parties accused were there.
Stran 58 - Some fact should be proved by testimony independent of the accomplice, which, taken by itself, leads to the Inference, not only that a crime has been committed, but that the prisoner was implicated In It.
Stran 13 - ... (inter alia) within the limits of Her Majesty's dominions, equipping and despatching a vessel with intent or knowledge, or having reasonable cause to believe, that it would be employed in the military or naval service of any foreign State at war with a friendly State, and for preparing and fitting out a naval expedition to proceed against the dominions of a friendly State. During the course of the case the Crown withdrew the prosecution against Baird. In the end the jury disagreed in regard to...
Stran 63 - It has been decided, that to constitute an offence under this section it is not necessary that there should have been a disposal tantamount to a transfer of possession or control over the minor's person (Reg.