 | Pan American Union - 1948 - 708 strani
...following words: "California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and . . . the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in and power over th; belt, an incident to which is full dominie over the resources of the soil under tl water area,... | |
 | 1916 - 612 strani
...Supreme Court held that "California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and that the federal government rather than the state has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under that water area, including... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1948 - 352 strani
...there is to it. • Senator DONNELL. Incidentally, the Court, immediately following this language, that the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in and power over that belt, says this, does it not: * * * an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the Boil... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1948 - 974 strani
...we have stated that California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and that the Federal Government rather than the state has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to 21 Bull. No. 321, Dept. of Interior, Geological Survey. 19 Opinion of the Court. which... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1948 - 968 strani
...courts. Pp. 26-29. 4. California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast; and the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under that water area, including... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1948 - 1794 strani
...not vested in California. Mr. DANIEL. Yes, sir. Senator DONNELL. On the other hand, we have a holding that the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in ind power over that belt, incident to which is, as the Court says, full dominion over the resources... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1948 - 1738 strani
...vested in California. Mr. DANIEL. Yes, sir. Senator DON NELL. On the other hand, we have a holding that the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in mcl power over that belt, incident to which is, as the Court says, full lommion over the resources... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1949 - 238 strani
...against California — that California is not the owner of the 3-mile marginal belt along its coast, and that the Federal Government rather than the State has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under that water area, including... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1950 - 392 strani
...we have stated that California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and that the Federal Government rather than the state has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under that water area, including... | |
| |
California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and that the Federal Government rather than the state has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under... 
