...and regulations consistent with the policy proclaimed and needed to carry that policy into execution. The power of Congress to adopt such public policies...to presidential or military supervision or control. 579 Appendix to Opinion of the Court. tion "in the Government of the United States, or any Department...

...settle labor disputes, and fixing wages and working conditions in certain 8 YOUNGSTOWN CO. v. SAWYER. fields of our economy. The Constitution does not subject...to presidential or military supervision or control. It is said that other Presidents without congressional authority have taken possession of private business...

...of Congress to adopt such public policies as those proclaimed by the order is beyond question. * * * The Constitution does not subject this lawmaking power...to Presidential or military supervision or control. The Supreme Court has said the same thing Avith reference to these submerged lands in its opinion in...

...aggregate of his constitutional powers as the Nation's Chief Executive and the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States." The opinion of...emergency, and that power of seizure or taking can he authorized only by Congress. If Mr. Justice Black's opinion was the only opinion for the majority...

...Supreme Court held that the seizure order was in the category of lawmaking and that "the Constitution did not subject this law-making power of Congress to presidential or military supervision or control. . . . The founders of this nation entrusted the law-making power to the Congress alone in both good...

...shall make laws which the President is to execute [citing art. I, sec. 1 of the Constitution] * * *. The Constitution does not subject this lawmaking power...to Presidential or military supervision or control" (pp. 587, 588) and Mr. Justice Jackson said: "But no doctrine that the Court could promulgate would...

...such public policies as those proclaimed by the order is beyond question. * * * The i.'wstitution docs not subject this lawmaking power of Congress to presidential or military supervision or control." w [Emphasis added.] si Myers v. U. 8., 272 US 117 : Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Peters 498, 513 : United...

...proclaimed by the order is beyond question. * * * The Constitution does not subject this lawmakinp power of Congress to presidential or military supervision or control." * [Emphasis added.] ;- In re Xeagle, 135 US 63. '"Myers v. US, 272 US 117: Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Peters 498, 513: United...

...such implied authority. The Court said, ditions in certain fields in our economy. The Constitution did not subject this law-making power of Congress to presidential or military supervision or control. Inasmuch as the authority of the respondents, under the guise of granting or denying clearance for...

...seizure of the Youngstown Steel facilities, said that: "This is a job for the Nation's lawmakers, * * *. The Constitution does not subject this lawmaking power...Presidential or military supervision or control." Mr. PHILBIN. That would not be right to the point as to the section we are now discussing. Mr. CLARK....