We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether reasonable or not than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large... A Treatise on the Law and Practice of Injunctions - Stran 380avtor: William Williamson Kerr - 1903 - 656 straniCelotni ogled - O knjigi
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1892 - 734 strani
...order to be valid, must be only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection to the party in ftvor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. This is the principle which controlled the decision in Mandeville v. Harman,... | |
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - 812 strani
...in Horncr v. Graves, 7 Bing. 735, and uniformly adopted in subsequent cases, is this : to consider whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interest of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest... | |
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1893 - 690 strani
...is only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection to the interest of the party in whose favor it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public." Brewer v. Marshall, 4 CE Or. 587. See, also, reference to other cases to same... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1837 - 988 strani
...CJ, there lays down the rule thus : " We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question, whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford & fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1900 - 840 strani
...follows : "We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether the agreement is reasonable or not than by considering whether the...a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever... | |
| John William Smith, John Innes Clark Hare, Horace Binney Wallace, John William Wallace - 1855 - 1006 strani
...(says Tindal, CJ, in Horner v. Graves, 7 Bingh. 743,) how a better test can be applied to the question, whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether...a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever... | |
| Charles Manley Smith - 1860 - 622 strani
...would be reasonable, and beyond which, excessive. But " a better test cannot be applied to the question whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to aftbrd a fuir protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large... | |
| 1863 - 620 strani
...means of locomotion, and the mode of conducting business. The true test is, whether the restraint was such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the purchasers, and not so largo as to interfere with the interests of the public. They cited, Wallw v.... | |
| Charles Davidson - 1864 - 638 strani
...restraint, has given rise to much litigation. The test to be applied is, whether the restriction imposed is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in whose favour it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever... | |
| Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1866 - 628 strani
...Barn. & Cressw. 145, 152; 1 Chitty's PI (6th Amer. ed.) 370. i The proper question in such cases is, whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it it granted, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Ho*... | |
| |