| United States. Tax Court - 1985 - 1036 strani
...or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion; finally, the statute must not foster "an excessive government entanglement with religion." Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 US 602, 612-613 (1971), quoting Walz v. Tax Commission, 397 US 664, 674 (1970) (citations omitted). Petitioner... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs - 1980 - 510 strani
...primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion, . . . ; finally, the statute must not foster 'an excessive government entanglement with religion.'" Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 US 602 (1971) at 612-613. S. 1782 and similar bills surely have a secular legislative purpose. However, when... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1982 - 1208 strani
...primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion . . . ; finally the statute must not foster 'an excessive government entanglement with religion.' " Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 US 602, 612-613 (1971) (citations omitted). If a statute violates any of these three principles, it must be... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs - 1988 - 402 strani
...or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion; third, the statute must not foster an excessive government entanglement with...religion. Lemon v. Kurtzman. 403 US 602, 612-13 (1971). S.2250 fails to satisfy any of these requirements. The bill has no secular legislative purpose, but... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs - 1988 - 478 strani
...or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion; third, the statute must not foster an excessive government entanglement with religion. Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 US 602, 612-l3 (l97l). S.2250 fails to satisfy any of these requirements. The bill has no secular legislative... | |
| |