Nomination of James P. Coleman: Hearing, 89-1, July 12-13m 19651965 - 164 strani |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
14th amendment action appointment Attorney General KATZENBACH believe bill Board of Education campaign Chairman Chief Justice circuit judge citizens civil rights Clarion-Ledger Clennon King Congress Congressman constitutionality CONYERS Court of Appeals declared desegregation disqualify district court EMERSON enforcement fact Federal court Federal Government Federal judges Federal judiciary Federal law Fifth Circuit Fifth Circuit Court Governor Coleman Governor of Mississippi hear integration interposition J. P. Coleman Jackson judicial jurisdiction KENNEDY of Massachusetts L.Ed lawyer legislation Legislature Louisiana LUSKY ment Negro opinion Orleans Parish Orleans Parish School person political position public schools question race racial segregation record resolution S.Ct segregationist Senator Eastland Senator ERVIN Senator FONG Senator HART Senator HRUSKA Senator JAVITS Senator KENNEDY South Southern statement statute subcommittee Thank three-judge tion U.S. Senate U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional United University of Mississippi vote Washington White Citizens Councils
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 66 - That this assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare that it views the powers of the Federal Government as resulting from the compact to which the States are parties...
Stran 65 - That the several States composing the United States of America are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government; but that by compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States...
Stran 70 - ... the General Assembly doth solemnly appeal to the like dispositions in the other states, in confidence that they will concur with this commonwealth in declaring, as it does hereby declare, that the acts aforesaid are unconstitutional ; — and that the necessary and proper measures will be taken by each for co-operating with this state, in maintaining unimpaired the authorities, rights, and liberties, reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
Stran 66 - Government is the exclusive judge of the extent of the powers delegated to it, stop nothing [short] of despotism — since the discretion of those who administer the government, and not the Constitution, would be the measure of their powers: That the several states who formed that instrument being sovereign and independent, have the unquestionable right to judge of the infraction; and, That a Nullification by those sovereignties, of all unauthorized acts done under color of that instrument is the...
Stran 66 - Government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that as in all other cases of compact among parties having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions, as of the mode and measure of redress.
Stran 68 - State, sometimes termed its police power, to prescribe regulations to promote the health, peace, morals, education and good order of the people, and to legislate so as to increase the industries of the State, develop its resources, and add to its wealth and prosperity.
Stran 49 - Article VI of the Constitution makes the Constitution the "supreme Law of the Land." In 1803, Chief Justice Marshall, speaking for a unanimous Court, referring to the Constitution as "the fundamental and paramount law of the nation," declared in the notable case of Marbury v.
Stran 64 - When a State exercises power wholly within the domain of state interest, it is insulated from federal judicial review. But such insulation is not carried over when state power is used as an instrument for circumventing a federally protected right.
Stran 62 - ... the usual and most effectual precautions are taken to secure this impartiality. Some such tribunal is clearly essential to prevent an appeal to the sword and a dissolution of the compact; and that it ought to be established under the general rather than under the local governments, or, to speak more properly, that it could be safely established under the first alone, is a position not likely to be combated.
Stran 50 - Brown was unanimously reached by this Court only after the case had been briefed and twice argued and the issues had been given the most serious consideration. Since the first Brown opinion three new Justices have come to the Court. They are at one with the Justices still on the Court who participated in that basic decision as to its correctness, and that decision is now unanimously reaffirmed. The principles announced in that decision and the obedience of the States to them, according to the command...