 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1919 - 760 strani
...for the most part to the testimony of two witnesses, John L. Brock and J. Chauncey Van Horn ; four to the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict for the plaintiff, for the full amount claimed and two to alleged errors in the charge of the trial court to... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1897 - 824 strani
...bring error upon a judgment for plaintiff of $500. The first and most important question arises upon the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendants. This involves a construction of the contract, which counsel for the defendants say was... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 830 strani
...following grounds: "I wish to move the court, under the record as made on the declaration, that the court direct a verdict for the defendant on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to establish a case of negligence against the defendant. In the first place, it appears... | |
 | 1860 - 874 strani
...subsequent to the service- The defendant's counsel called on the learned judge to non-suit the plaintiff, or to direct a verdict for the defendant, on the ground that the plaintiff was not duly registered at the time of the services. This my brother Grqeue refused to do. Evidence... | |
 | 1892 - 1150 strani
...to excuse the error, solely because no motion wn»- made to strike it out. The next alleged error is the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendant. The contention is that the undisputed evidence shows no liability upon the part of the defendant.... | |
 | 1921 - 958 strani
...his motion In each case for a new trial; to the admission of certain testimony of George G. Smith; to the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendant in the case of Smith т. Koretsky. The exception to the testimony of George G. Smith has... | |
 | 1919 - 1046 strani
...testimony, for the most part to the testimony of two witnesses John L. Brock and J. Chauncey Van Horn; four to the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount claimed, and two to alleged errors in the charge of the trial court to... | |
 | 1917 - 1184 strani
...the exceptions of the defendant to the refusal of the trial court to grant the defendant a new trial, to the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendant, to the admission and rejection of testimony, to the refusal to charge the jury as requesled,... | |
 | 1902 - 1164 strani
...Dungan & Reger, for defendant In error. PER CURIAM. We find no error In the refusal to nonsuit, nor in the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendant. The liability of the defendant company depended upon whether the fence which separated its... | |
| |
The exception was to the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendant... 
