...could not recover the 101. profit which he was obliged to repay, though laid as special damage ; and that the measure of damages was the difference between the value of the horse, if sound, (of which the price was only strong evidence), and the sum it brought as unsound....

...The plaintiff in error assigned the following errors: — 1. The court erred in instructing the jury, that the measure of damages was the difference between the value of the wheat here, (in Pittsburgh.) adding the freight, and the value in Philadelphia. 2. There was error...

...to tender the residue of the hay, at the ship's side, in order to entitle himself to damages ; and, that the measure of damages was the difference, between the value of the hay, at the place, where it was left, and its value, at the port of destination, deducting freight...

...called upon the Court so to charge, but his Honor declined giving such instruction, and told the jury that the measure of damages was the difference between the value of one half of the schooner at the time of Walker's sale to Simmons, and the redemption money then to...

...question is upon the rule laid down by the court for the measure of damages. The court told the jury that the measure of damages was the difference between the value of the horse as he was, and his value if sound. This, it Brown v. Keller. is said, was in conflict with what...

...the sums paid the brokers for effecting the sales or the sum paid for searching the title, but ruled that the measure of damages was the difference between the value of the premises unrestricted (which could not be deemed more than $5,300, the price she paid Darling), and...

...was sunk and the cargo entirely destroyed. J/cld, 1. That the two boats must be considered as one ; that the measure of damages was the difference between the value of the two boats and cargoes before and after the accident ; 2. That evidence is. admissible to show that...

...the premises and sent a bill to plaintiff for the expense of the repairs. The court charged the jury that the measure of damages was the difference between the value of the premises as they were and as they would have been had they been kept in repair. Also, that if the jury...

...arising upon the record involves a consideration of the instructions in regard to the measure of damages. The court, at the instance of appellee, instructed...the contract did not arise from any impure motive Pluiumer v. lligdon. or fraudulent purpose. The difficulty was, that lie only had title to au undivided...

...was a case where a sale warranted burglar proof had been broken into and valuables stolen, holding that the measure of damages was the difference between the value of the safe, as it •was, and what it would have been worth if as warranted, and that no recovery could be...