 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1921 - 664 strani
...that "the master is not responsible if the wrong done by the servant is done without his authority, and not for the purpose of executing his orders or doing his work," the cases of Event v. K rouse, 70 Id. 653; Doran v. Thomsen, 76 Id. 754; Missell v. Hayes, 86 Id. 348;... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1881 - 708 strani
...plaintiff. SOULE, J. At common law, the master is responsible for the wrongful acts of his servant done in the execution of the authority given by the master, and for the purpose of performing what the master has directed, whether the wrong done be occasioned VOL. XIV. 19 bj the mere negligence of... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1881 - 896 strani
...for plaintiff. SOULE, J. At common law the master is responsible for the wrongful acts of his servant done in the execution of the authority given by the master, and for the purpose of performing what the master has directed, whether the wrong done be occasioned by the • See note, 2S Am. Bep. 383.... | |
 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - 1883 - 760 strani
...case, the master is not responsible if the wrong done by his servant is done without his authority, and not for the purpose of executing his orders, or doing his work ; so that if the servant, wholly for a purpose of his own, disregarding the object for which lie was... | |
 | 1902 - 1270 strani
...ease the master Is not responsible if the wrong done by the servant is done without his authority, and not for the purpose of executing his orders or doing his work. So that if the servant, wholly for a purpose of his own, disregarding the object for which he is employed,... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1892 - 1050 strani
...case, the master is not responsible if the wrong done by his servant is done without his authority, and not for the purpose of executing his orders or doing his work. So that if the servant, wholly for a purpose of his own, disregarding the object for which he was employed,... | |
 | Indiana. Appellate Court - 1893 - 682 strani
...says in the opinion : "At common law, the master is responsible for the wrongful acts of his servant done in the execution of the authority given by the master, and for the purpose of performing what the master has directed, whether the wrong done be occasioned by the mere negligence of the servant,... | |
 | 1894 - 1120 strani
...doing the work of the master, the latter is not responsible in damages therefor; but if the act be done in the execution of the authority given by the master, and for the purpose of performing what be has directed, he is responsible whether the wrong done be occasioned by negligence, or by a wanton... | |
 | Eugene Wambaugh - 1896 - 1100 strani
...case, the master is not responsible if the wrong done by the servant is done without his authority, and not for the purpose of executing his orders or doing his work. So that if the servant, wholly for a purpose of his own, disregarding the object for which he is employed,... | |
 | New Hampshire. Supreme Court - 1900 - 698 strani
...unlawful manner. When, however, the servant, for his own purpose, does a wrong without the direction or authority of the master and not for the purpose of executing his orders or doing his work, the master is not liable. Wilson v. Peverly, 2 1ST. H. 548 ; Grimes v. Kerne, 52 NH 330 ; Andrews v.... | |
| |
And in an action of tort in the nature of an action on the case, the master is not responsible if the wrong done by the servant is done without his authority, and not for the purpose of executing his orders or doing his work. 
