...modern lethal weapon." The Court also speculated that under the Miller rule, Congress could not regulate "the possession or use by private persons not present...military unit, of distinctly military arms, such as machineguns, trench mortars, antitank or antiaircraft guns, even though under the circumstances surrounding...

...modern lethal weapon." The court also speculated that under the Miller rule Congress could not regulate "the possession or use by private persons not present...military unit, of distinctly military arms, such as machineguns, trench mortars, antitank or antiaircraft guns, even though under the circumstances surrounding...

...modern lethal weapon." The Court also speculated that under the Miller rule, Congress could not regulate "the possession or use by private persons not present...military unit, of distinctly military arms, such as machineguns, trench mortars, antitank or antiaircraft guns, even though under the circumstances surrounding...

...modern lethal weapon." The court also speculated that under the Miller rule Congress could not regulate "the possession or use by private persons not present...military unit, of distinctly military arms, such as inachiiiegiins, trench mortars, antitank or antiaircraft guns, even though under the circumstances...

...modern lethal weapon." The Court also speculated that under the Miller rule. Congress could not regulate "the possession or use by private persons not present...military unit, of distinctly military arms, such as machineguns. trench mortars, antitank or antiaircraft guns, even though under the circumstances surrounding...

...modern lethal weapon". The oourt also speculated that under the Miller rule Congress could not regulate "the possession or use by private persons not present...have any legitimate reason for having such a weapon". Ill The rights of the individual citizen would be little different today if the Second Amendment did...

...The court also speculated that under the Miller rule Congress could not regulate '•the i>ossession or use by private persons not present or prospective...have any legitimate reason for having such a weapon". 1П The rights of the individual citizen would be little different today if the Second Amendment did...

...speculated that under the Miller rule Congress could not regulate "the possession or use by private jiersons not present or prospective members of any military...have any legitimate reason for having such a weapon". Ill The rights of the individual citizen would be little different today if the Second Amendment did...

...lethal weapon". TTi» court also speculated that under the Miller rule Congress could not regulate "the possession or use by private persons not present or prospective members of My military unit, of distinctly military arms, such as machine guns, trench mortars, anti-tank or anti-aircraft...

...modern-day efficacy of the Miller rule by speculating that Congress did not have the power to regulate "the possession or use by private persons not present...possession or use it would be inconceivable that a person could have any legitimate reason for having such a weapon." Interestingly enough, the Bill of...