 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1912 - 794 strani
...have already indicated that the act of Toof & Co. was not a wrongful act. Was there competent evidence that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the damage? The circuit judge found that plaintiff was prevented from entering the employment solely by... | |
 | 1885 - 544 strani
...Wright & Hudson, for appellee. SERVERS, J. 1. The material question presented in this record is whether the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury received by the plaintiff. The evidence tended to show that the rails spread, and a portion of the... | |
 | 1917 - 2042 strani
...circumstances. Any service but prompt service would be worthless, so prompt service was required. The jury found that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the damage suffered by the plaintiff. The defendant must be held to have known the dangerous character... | |
 | 1903 - 1112 strani
...case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. The crucial question in this case is whether or not the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury of the plaintiff, so that, in the legal acceptation of that term, it contributed to her hurt. "Causo... | |
 | 1917 - 1038 strani
...circumstances. Any service but prompt service would be worthless, so prompt service was required. The jury found that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the damage suffered by the plaintiff. The defendant must be held to have known the dangerous character... | |
 | Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - 1882 - 764 strani
...this must be determined in view of the circumstances existing at the time." "Within this definition, the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury to Mrs. Brown, as there was no other cause, not incident to such negligence, which intervened to cause... | |
 | 1913 - 1236 strani
...operations afterwards performed, and the suffering occasioned thereby, then and in that case I charge you that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury, for which jihiintiff seeks to recover damages." The court refused to give these requested instructions,... | |
 | 1908 - 1164 strani
...drawn from them they make a fair case for presentation to a jury to determine the question whether any negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the Injury to the plaintiff. The evidence on the subject Is vague, but it seems sufficient to justify the belief... | |
 | 1912 - 1146 strani
...which had a defective brake, sufficiently showed that plaintiff was in the discharge of his duties, and that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury. [Ed. Note.— For other cases, see Railroads, Cent. Dig. §§ 910-923; Dec. Dig. § 2S2.*] 2. RAILROADS... | |
| |
But if you should believe that it has not been shown by the preponderance of the testimony that the negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury... 
