 For our purposes we must assume that if a state of facts could exist that would justify such legislation, it actually did exist when the statute now under consideration was passed. For us the question is one of power, not of expediency. If no state of...  The Pacific Reporter - Stran 1811904Celotni ogled - O knjigi
 | Illinois - 1877 - 182 strani
...statute now under consideration was passed. For us the question is one of power, not of expediency. If no state of circumstances could exist to justify...legislative power the legislature is the exclusive judge. Neither is it a matter of any moment that no precedent can be found for a statute precisely like this.... | |
 | 1877 - 558 strani
...statute now under consideration was passed. For us the question is one of power, not of expediency. If no state of circumstances could exist to justify...legislative power the legislature is the exclusive judge. Neither is it a matter of any moment that no preccib'ut can be found for a statute precisely like this.... | |
 | United States. Congress. House - 1877 - 526 strani
...statute now under consideration was ]*sseil. For us the question is one of power, not of expediency. If no state of circumstances could exist to justify...void because in excess of the legislative power of tho State, : but if it could, we must presume it did. Of the propriety of legislative interference... | |
 | David Rorer - 1884 - 996 strani
...statute now under consideration was passed. For us the question is one of power, not of expediency. If no state of circumstances could exist to justify such a statute, then we nuy declare this one void, because in excess of the legislative po\ver of the state. But if it could,... | |
 | 1893 - 1164 strani
...in Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 113, 132: "For us the question is oue of power, not of expediency. * * * Of the propriety of legislative interference within...legislative power, the legislature is the exclusive judge." In applying Mr. Justice SWAYNE'S rule still further, we fail to discover anything on the face of the... | |
 | 1887 - 1086 strani
...Ferry Co. 11 Wall. 423 (78 US Ijk. 30, L. ed. 192). "The question is one of power, not of expediency . If no state of circumstances could exist to justify...in excess of the legislative power of the State." Mann v. Ittinoit, 94 US 132 (Bk. 34, L. ed. 87). The defendant, being a corporation created hy a law... | |
 | 1889 - 988 strani
...expediency If no state of circumstances can justify such a statute, then we may declare this one void; but if it could, we must presume it did. Of the propriety of legislative interference within the scope of legislativo power, the legislature is the exclusive judge. The controlling fact is the power to regulate... | |
 | New Hampshire. Forestry Commission - 1901 - 32 strani
...such exercise of its police power. In the leading case above cited, the court, by Waite, CJ, said: 'Of the propriety of legislative interference within...legislative power, the legislature is the exclusive judge. Neither is it a matter of any moment that no precedent can be found for a statute precisely like this.... | |
 | James Bradley Thayer - 1895 - 1214 strani
...statute now under consideration was passed. For us the question is one of power, not of expediency. If no state of circumstances could exist to justify...must presume it did. Of the propriety of legislative inter- L fere n ce within the scope of legislative power, the legislature is the exclusive judge. Neither... | |
 | New Hampshire. Forestry Commission - 1897 - 40 strani
...such exercise of its police power. In the leading case above cited, the court, by Waite, CJ, said : " Of the propriety of legislative interference within...legislative power, the legislature is the exclusive judge. Neither is it a matter of any moment that no precedent can be found for a statute precisely like this.... | |
| |
