Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle over Guns
Oxford University Press, 5. sep. 2007 - 176 strani
Few constitutional disputes maintain as powerful a grip on the public mind as the battle over the Second Amendment. The National Rifle Association and gun-control groups struggle unceasingly over a piece of the political landscape that no candidate for the presidency--and few for Congress--can afford to ignore. But who's right? Will it ever be possible to settle the argument? In Out of Range, one of the nation's leading legal scholars takes a calm, objective look at this bitter debate. Mark V. Tushnet brings to this book a deep expertise in the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the role of the law in American life. He breaks down the different positions on the Second Amendment, showing that it is a mistake to stereotype them. Tushnet's exploration is honest and nuanced; he finds the constitutional arguments finely balanced, which is one reason the debate has raged for so long. Along the way, he examines various experiments in public policy, from both sides, and finds little clear evidence for the practical effectiveness of any approach to gun safety and prosecution. Of course, he notes, most advocates of the right to keep and bear arms agree that it should be subject to reasonable regulation. Ultimately, Tushnet argues, our view of the Second Amendment reflects our sense of ourselves as a people. The answer to the debate will not be found in any holy writ, but in our values and our vision of the nation. This compact, incisive examination offers an honest and thoughtful guide to both sides of the argument, pointing the way to solutions that could calm, if not settle, this bitter dispute.
Mnenja - Napišite recenzijo
Out of range: why the Constitution can't end the battle over gunsUporabnikova ocena - Not Available - Book Verdict
In the latest in Oxford's "Inalienable Rights" series, Tushnet (William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, Harvard Law Sch.;A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law ... Celotno mnenje
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
adopted Amendment’s preamble American argued argument bear arms Bill of Rights carrying concealed weapons citizen-militia citizens collective-rights view committee confiscation Congress crime and violence crime rates criminals cultural theory culture wars decision defensive gun effects Emerson enforce ernment federal Firearms and Violence Fourteenth Amendment gun owners gun ownership gun policy gun violence gun-control proponents gun-rights advocates gun-rights proponents handgun individual right individual-rights view issue Jens Ludwig John John Kerry Judge Justice Kahan keep and bear Law Review less crime licensing test limit Lott ment national government Natty Bumppo oppressive government original understanding originalist percent political possession prohibit Project Exile reason reduce gun violence reference regulated militia rifles right to bear right to keep safe-storage laws Second Amendment Second Amendment’s meaning self-defense shooting Standard Model standing armies state-organized militias statistical Supreme Court survey there’s tion violated Virginia visited June