Regulating Religion: The Courts and the Free Exercise Clause

Sprednja platnica
Oxford University Press, 2001 - 269 strani
"In this book, Catharine Cookson challenges the wisdom of this judicial drift, and its false dichotomy between anarchy and order. In its place she offers the process of casuistry, a method of reasoning grounded within the legal tradition as well as social ethics. Using this casuistry-based method, Cookson treats free exercise cases as a type of conflict of principles: the principle good of free exercise is in conflict with the principle good espoused in the legislation. To resolve this conflict, both parties must come forward with profs and evidence. The particular context of the conflict is emphasized, with a close examination of the facts of the case, as well as the pragmatic good to be accomplished and the pragmatic evils to be avoided under the statue. Casuistry is not a content-free process, and Cookson delves into the Western Christian tradition for appropriate principles and paradigms to be used in a casuistical free exercise analysis.".
 

Vsebina

Introduction
3
Legislation or the Free Exercise Clause?
6
2 The Process of Casuistry
39
Typologies of the Relationship between Conscience and the State
48
4 The Religiously Encumbered Self
99
5 Societal Boundaries Paranoia and Ill Humor and the Role of the Courts under the Free Exercise Clause
109
6 A Critique of the Courts Free Exercise Clause Jurisprudence in the US Supreme Court Case of Employment Division
118
7 Governmental Intervention in and Punishment for the Use of Spiritual Healing Methods
149
A Summary and Some Conclusions
186
Notes
189
Index
267
Avtorske pravice

Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse

Pogosti izrazi in povedi

O avtorju (2001)

Catherine Cookson is at Virginia Wesleyan College.

Bibliografski podatki