Hastings Law Journal, Količina 57University of California, Hastings College of the Law,., 2006 |
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–3 od 64
Stran 731
stake in reconceptualizing the mitigation - waiver conundrum . A capital defendant's actual interest in waiving mitigation may not conflict with the antecedent interest in reliable capital sentencing if mitigation belongs to the ...
stake in reconceptualizing the mitigation - waiver conundrum . A capital defendant's actual interest in waiving mitigation may not conflict with the antecedent interest in reliable capital sentencing if mitigation belongs to the ...
Stran 732
... mitigation presentation does function to put a broader frame around the violent episode that necessitates the penalty - phase proceeding . By recasting the view of the aggravated nature of the crime , mitigation supposedly diminishes ...
... mitigation presentation does function to put a broader frame around the violent episode that necessitates the penalty - phase proceeding . By recasting the view of the aggravated nature of the crime , mitigation supposedly diminishes ...
Stran 754
201 allowing a capital defendant to veto a mitigation presentation . The argument against allocating that power to capital defendants who wish to express their autonomy by waiving mitigation cannot be dressed up to foster the impression ...
201 allowing a capital defendant to veto a mitigation presentation . The argument against allocating that power to capital defendants who wish to express their autonomy by waiving mitigation cannot be dressed up to foster the impression ...
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
activities agencies Amendment amount analysis attorneys autonomy benefits Blackmun Papers CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY capital defendant caseloads Chief Justice Code compensatory damages conduct constitutional contract County criminal decision deduction defendant's desalination dissenting due process EITC employment experimental use exception federal fraudulent conveyance funding Hale's Hastings Hetch Hetchy income indigent defense individual infringement involved issue judge jury Justice Scalia juvenile justice last visited Apr Law Assistant Professor Law Professor lawyers liberty interest litigation mitigation Morrissey opinion patent Penn Central plaintiff problem procedural Professor of Law programs property rights protection public defender punishment punitive damages punitive damages award reason regulation regulatory takings Rehnquist requirements right to counsel Rule sexual harassment supra note Supreme Court TANF taxpayer trial Tuolumne River U.S. Supreme Court UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA unreasonably small capital waiver welfare Yuba Yuba River