Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Deli 3–4U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967 |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
accounting for joint advertising rates agencies agreement alleged Amendment American ANPA Anthony Catanzaro antitrust laws Associated Press broadcast by-laws carrier cent circulation Clayton Act combination commerce Commission competing competition competitors contract corporation cost daily newspaper defendants District Court economic Editor & Publisher editorial effect employees equipment fact failing company Federal Federal Communications Commission Federal Trade Commission franchise dealer freedom Harte-Hanks Hearst home delivery increased industry interest joint ownerships Journal Kansas City Star labor linage mass communication ment merger million monopoly national advertising Newhouse newspaper circulation newspaper publishing newsprint operation opinion Oregonian owners papers Petitioner plaintiff printing purchase radio relevant market restraint retail revenue Robinson-Patman Act Section sell Sherman Act SMSA stations story Sunday Supp supra note Supreme Court television Times-Picayune tion total after accounting trade Union violation York
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 1666 - was without power to protect that freedom. * * • That Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society.
Stran 1893 - Theodore Markowitz, being duly sworn, deposes and says that deponent is the Plaintiff in the within action; that deponent has read the foregoing Complaint and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to deponent's own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on Information and
Stran 2068 - 4. The several district courts of the United States are hereby invested with jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of this act; and it shall be the duty of the several district attorneys of the United States, in their respective districts, under the direction of the Attorney-General, to institute proceedings in equity to prevent and restrain such violations. ..." 26 Stat. 209,36 Stat. 1167,15 USC
Stran 1863 - alleged violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The case Is scheduled to go to trial on February 12, 1968. 10. (1827) United States v. The Lima News. Civil 64-178 (WD Ohio): On November 19, 1964 a complaint was
Stran 1941 - be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that, except as to the amount of damages, there is no genuine issue as to
Stran 2063 - The anti-trust laws are as much violated • by the prevention of competition as by its destruction. United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, supra. It follows a fortiori that the use of monopoly power, however lawfully acquired, to foreclose competition, to gain a competitive advantage, or to destroy a competitor, is unlawful.
Stran 1498 - commerce, where in any line of commerce in any section of the country, the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a monopoly". The
Stran 2064 - concern for freedom of the press which prompted adoption of the First Amendment -. should be read as a command that the government was without power £ to protect that freedom. The First Amendment, far from providing an , argument against application of the . Sherman Act, here provides powerful reasons to the contrary. That . Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible
Stran 2065 - of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society. Surely a command that the
Stran 1666 - the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas—that the best test of truth is the