HNSON

h there

to with the Principal at our head, Dr. Adam Ferguson, whose "Essay on the History of Civil Society" gives him a respectable place in the ranks of literature, was with us. rote As the college buildings are indeed very mean, the Prinhcipal said to Dr. Johnson, that he must give them the

same epithet that a Jesuit did when showing a poor college the abroad: "Hoe miseriæ nostræ." Dr. Johnson was, however, much pleased with the library, and with the conversation of Dr. James Robertson, professor of Oriental languages, the librarian. We talked of Kennicott's edition of the Hebrew Bible, and hoped it would be quite faithful. JOHNSON. "Sir, I know not any crime so great that a man could contrive to commit, as poisoning the sources of eternal truth."

I pointed out to him where there formerly stood an old wall enclosing part of the college, which I remember bulged out in a threatening manner, and of which there was a common tradition similar to that concerning Bacon's study at Oxford, that it would fall upon some very learned man. It had some time before this been taken down, that the street might be widened, and a more convenient wall built. Dr. Johnson, glad of an opportunity to have a pleasant hit at Scottish learning, said, "They have been afraid it never would fall."

We showed him the royal infirmary, for which, and for every other exertion of generous public spirit in his power, that noble-minded citizen of Edinburgh, George Drummond,' will be ever held in honourable remembrance. And we were too proud not to carry him to the abbey of Holyrood House, that beautiful piece of architecture, but, alas! that deserted mansion of royalty, which Hamilton of Bangour, in one of his elegant poems, calls,

"A virtuous palace, where no monarch dwells."

I was much entertained while Principal Robertson fluently harangued to Dr. Johnson, upon the spot, concerning

This excellent magistrate died in 1766. Some years after his death, a bust of him, by Nollekens, was placed in the public hall of the hospital, with this inscription from the pen of Robertson :-" George Drummond, to whom this country is indebted for all the benefit which it derives from the royal infirmary."

scenes of his celebrated "History of Scotland." We surveyed that part of the palace appropriated to the Duke of Hamilton, as keeper, in which our beautiful Queen Mary lived, and in which David Rizzio was murdered, and also the state rooms. Dr. Johnson was a great reciter of all sorts of things, serious or comical. I overheard him repeating here in a kind of muttering tone, a line of the old ballad, "Johnny Armstrong's Last Good Night.'

"And ran him through the fair body!

2

We returned to my house, where there met him at dinner, the Duchess of Douglas, Sir Adolphus Oughton, Lord Chief Baron [Orde], Sir William Forbes, Principal Robertson, Mr. Cullen, advocate. Before dinner, he told us of a curious conversation between the famous George Faulkner and him. George said, that England had drained Ireland of fifty thousand pounds in specie, annually, for fifty years. "How so, Sir?" said Dr. Johnson: "you must have very great trade? "No trade."—"Very rich mines? mines."—"From whence, then, does all this money come?" "Come! why out of the blood and bowels of the poor people of Ireland!"

66

'No

He seemed to me to have an unaccountable prejudice against Swift; for I once took the liberty to ask him, if

3

1 The stanza from which he took this line is—

"But then rose up all Edinburgh,

They rose up by thousands three;
A cowardly Scot came John behind,
And ran him through the fair body!"

"An

2 Margaret, daughter of James Douglas, Esq., of the Mains. old lady," writes Dr. Johnson," who talks broad Scotch with a paralytic voice, and is scarce understood by her own countrymen."-Letters, vol. i., p. 109.-Croker.

66

3 There probably was no opportunity for what could be in strictness called personal offence, as they had never met; but I suspect that the affair of the Dublin degree (Life, vol. i., p. 93) may have created this prejudice. But what could Johnson mean by calling Swift "shallow"? If he be shallow, who, in his department of literature, is profound? Without admitting that Swift was inferior in coarse humour to Arbuthnot" (of whose precise share in the works to which he is supposed to have contributed, we know little or nothing), it may be observed, that he who is second to the greatest masters of different styles may be said to be the first on the whole. It is as certain that the Tale of a Tub was Swift's as that the Rambler was Johnson's.-Croker.

We su

Duke

en Mar

n28

repeat

the all

inner

Lord

Cober

s of a

eland

Swift had personally offended him, and he told me he had
not. He said to-day, Swift is clear, but he is shallow.
In coarse humour he is inferior to Arbuthnot; in delicate
humour he is inferior to Addison. So he is inferior to his
contemporaries, without putting him against the whole.
world. I doubt if the Tale of a Tub' was his; it has so
much more thinking, more knowledge, more power, more
colour, than any of the works which are indisputably his.
If it was his, I shall only say, he was impar sibi.”
We gave him as good a dinner as we could. Our Scotch
muir-fowl, or grouse, were then abundant, and quite in
season; and so far as wisdom and wit can be aided by
administering agreeable sensations to the palate, my wife
took care that our great guest should not be deficient.

1

Sir Adolphus Oughton, then our deputy commander-inchief, who was not only an excellent officer, but one of the most universal scholars 1 I ever knew, had learned the Erse language, and expressed his belief in the authenticity of Ossian's Poetry. Dr. Johnson took the opposite side of that perplexed question, and I was afraid the dispute would have run high between them. But Sir Adolphus, who had a very sweet temper, changed the discourse, grew playful, laughed at Lord Monboddo's notion of men having tails, and called him a judge à posteriori, which amused Dr. Johnson, and thus hostilities were prevented.

At

supper we had Dr. Cullen, his son the advocate, Dr. Adam Fergusson, and Mr. Crosbie, advocate. Witchcraft was introduced. Mr. Crosbie said he thought it the greatest blasphemy to suppose evil spirits counteracting the Deity, and raising storms, for instance, to destroy his creatures. JOHNSON. "Why, Sir, if moral evil be consistent with the government of the Deity, why may not physical evil be also consistent with it? It is not more strange that there should be evil spirits than evil men: evil unembodied spirits, than evil embodied spirits. And as to storms, we know there are such things; and it is no worse that evil spirits raise them than that they rise." CROSBIE. "But it is not credible that witches should have effected what they

Lord Stowell remembered with pleasure the elegance and extent or Sir Adolphus Oughton's literature, and the suavity of his manners.Oroker.

66

other

are said in stories to have done." JOHNSON. "Sir, I am not defending their credibility. I am only saying that your arguments are not good, and will not overturn the belief of witchcraft.-(Dr. Fergusson said to me aside, He is right.')-And then, Sir, you have all mankind, rude and civilized, agreeing in the belief of the agency of preternatural powers. You must take evidence; you must consider that wise and great men have condemned witches to die." CROSBIE. 'But an act of parliament put an end to witchcraft." JOHNSON. "No, Sir, witchcraft had ceased; and, therefore, an act of parliament was passed to prevent persecution for what was not witchcraft. Why it ceased we cannot tell, as we cannot tell the reason of many things." Dr. Cullen, to keep up the gratification of mysterious disquisition, with the grave address for which he is remarkable in his companionable as in his professional hours, talked in a very entertaining manner, of people walking and conversing in their sleep. I am very sorry I have no note of this. We talked of the ouranoutang, and of Lord Monboddo's thinking that he might be taught to speak. Dr. Johnson treated this with ridicule. Mr. Crosbie said that Lord Monboddo believed the existence of every thing possible; in short, that all which is in posse might be found in esse. JOHNSON. "But, Sir, it is as possible that the ouran-outang does not speak, as that he speaks. However, I shall not contest the point. I should have thought it not possible to find a Monboddo; yet he exists." I again mentioned the stage. JOHNSON. The appearance of a player, with whom I have drunk tea, counteracts the imagination that he is the character he represents. Nay, you know, nobody imagines that he is the character he represents. They say, 'See Garrick! how he looks to-night! See how he'll clutch the dagger!' That is the buzz of the theatre."

Tuesday, Aug. 17.-Sir William Forbes came to breakfast, and brought with him Dr. Blacklock, whom he introduced to Dr. Johnson, who received him with a most humane complacency; "Dear Dr. Blacklock, I am glad to see you! Blacklock seemed to be much surprised when Dr. Johnson said, "it was easier to him to write poetry than to compose his Dictionary. His mind was less on the

stretch in doing the one than the other.' Besides, composing a dictionary requires books and a desk: you can make a poem walking in the fields, or lying in bed." Dr. Blacklock spoke of scepticism in morals and religion with apparent uneasiness, as if he wished for more certainty.2 Dr. Johnson, who had thought it all over, and whose vigorous understanding was fortified by much experience, thus encouraged the blind bard to apply to higher speculations what we all willingly submit to in common life: in short, he gave him more familiarly the able and fair reasoning of Butler's Analogy: "Why, Sir, the greatest concern we have in this world, the choice of our profession, must be determined without demonstrative reasoning. Human life is not yet so well known, as that we can have it and take the case of a man who is ill. I call two physicians: they differ in opinion. I am not to lie down, and die between them: I must do something." The conversation then turned on atheism; on that horrible book, "Système de la Nature; "" and on the supposition of an eternal necessity without design, without a governing mind. JOHNSON. "If it were so, why has it ceased? Why don't we see men thus produced around us now? Why, at least, does it not keep pace, in some measure, with the progress of time? If it stops because there is now no need of it, then it is plain there is, and ever has been, an all-powerful intelligence. But stay! (said he, with one of his satiric laughs). Ha! ha! ha! I shall suppose Scotchmen made necessarily, and Englishmen by choice."

At dinner this day we had Sir Alexander Dick, whose amiable character and ingenious and cultivated mind are so generally known (he was then on the verge of seventy, and is now (1785) eighty-one, with his faculties entire, his heart warm, and his temper gay); Sir David Dalrymple,

There is hardly any operation of the intellect which requires nicer and deeper consideration than definition. A thousand men may write verses for one who has the power of defining and discriminating the exact meaning of words and the principles of grammatical arrangement. -Croker.

2 See his Letter on this subject in the Appendix.

3 Written by the Baron d'Holbach, and published in the year 1770 under the pseudonym of Mirabaud.-Editor."

Sir A. Dick was born in 1703; died Nov. 10, 1785.-Wright.