 | Frederick Augustus Carrington, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Joseph Payne - 1825 - 948 strani
...prejudicial to the character of (a) 2 CM & II. 573. The judgment of Mr. Baron Purke will be found at p. 577. the plaintiff, and puts it upon him to prove that...there was malice in fact ; — that the defendant was actuate,! by motives of personal spite, or ill will, independent of the occasion on which the communication... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1836 - 816 strani
...only this ; that the occasion on which the communication was made rebuts the inference primd facie arising from a statement prejudicial to the character...the occasion on which the communication was made. In the present case Exch. of Pleat, it became, in my opinion, incumbent upon the plaintiff to shew... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1838 - 838 strani
...communication is this, that the occasion on which the communication was made, rebuts the inference jrrimd facie arising from a statement prejudicial to the character...defendant was actuated by motives of personal spite or ill will independent of the occasion on which the communication was madeb. If the matter of the libel... | |
 | Archibald John Stephens - 1842 - 998 strani
...communication on which the communication was made, rebuts the inference prima facie defined by Mr. arising from a statement prejudicial to the character of the plaintiff, and puts -m »"¡д^ v. it upon him to prove, that there was malice in fact — that the defendant was Woodgate.... | |
 | William Oldnall Russell - 1843 - 1086 strani
...is this : that the occasion on which the communication was made, rebuts the inference, primd facie, pwrecked, and getting on the same plank, one of them,...(e) But, according to Lord Hale, a man cannot even ill will, independent of the occasion on which the communication was made. This may be made out either... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Edmund Saunders - 1845 - 968 strani
...prejudicial to the character of the plaintiff, and throws on him the onus of proving malice in fact, t. e. that the defendant was actuated by motives of personal...the occasion on which the communication was made. 4 B. & C. 247. 8 B. & C. 578. Pattison v. Jones. the court of our lord the now king here is not yet... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1847 - 612 strani
...only this; that the occasion on which the communication was made, rebuts the inference primd facie arising from a statement prejudicial to the character...puts it upon him to prove that there was malice in fact—that the defendant was actuated by motives of personal spite and ill-will, independent of the... | |
 | Edmund Hatch Bennett, Chauncey Smith - 1851 - 680 strani
...is only this; that the occasion on which the communication was made rebuts the inference prima facie arising from a statement prejudicial to the character...defendant was actuated by motives of personal spite or ill will, independent of the occasion on which the communication was made." Then, was there any evidence... | |
 | John Frederick Archbold - 1853 - 1006 strani
...is this : that the occasion on which the communication was made, rebuts the inferenee, prima facie, arising from a statement prejudicial to the character...defendant was actuated by motives of personal spite or ill will, independent of tho occasion on which the communication was made. This may be made out either... | |
| |
'the proper meaning of a privileged communication is only this : that the occasion on which the communication was made rebuts the inference prima facie arising from a statement prejudicial to the character of the plaintiff, and puts it upon him to prove... 
