 | United States. Supreme Court - 1940 - 894 strani
...rights which may properly be asserted by it, the complaint shall be verified by oath and shall aver (1) that the plaintiff was a shareholder at the time of...transaction of which he complains or that his share thereafter devolved on him by operation of law and (2) that the action is not a collusive one to confer... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1889 - 936 strani
...Georgia. the case of Hawes vs. Oakland, supra, it is said that the bill must allege that the complainant was a shareholder at the time of the transaction of which he complains, or that his shares have devolved on him since by operation of law. And this is reiterated in Dimpfell vs. Ohio... | |
 | 1883 - 552 strani
...may properly be asserted by the corporation, must be upon a verified complaint, and such complaint must contain an allegation that the plaintiff was...his share had devolved on him since by operation of the law. The complaint must also set forth with particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure... | |
 | 1882 - 624 strani
...complainant was a shareholder at the time of the transactions of which he complains, or that his shares have devolved on him since by operation of law, and that...confer on a court of the United States jurisdiction in a case of which it could otherwise have no cognizance, should be in the bill which should be verified... | |
 | 1883 - 548 strani
...may properly be asserted by the corporation, must be upon a verified complaint, and such complaint must contain an allegation that the plaintiff was...share-holder at the time of the transaction 'of which lie complains, or that his share had devolved on him since by operation of the law. The complaint must... | |
 | 1962 - 1092 strani
[ Prikaz vsebine te strani ni dovoljen ] | |
 | 1882 - 1902 strani
[ Prikaz vsebine te strani ni dovoljen ] | |
 | 1952 - 1208 strani
[ Prikaz vsebine te strani ni dovoljen ] | |
 | 1883 - 1914 strani
...complains, or that his shares have devolved upon him since by operation of law, and that the suit was not a collusive one to confer on a court of the United States jurisdiction in a case of which it could otherwise have no cognizance, should be in the bill, which should be verified... | |
| |
... that the plaintiff was a shareholder at the time of the transaction of which he complains or that his share thereafter devolved on him by operation of law... 
