 When a given state of facts is such that reasonable men may fairly differ upon the question as to whether there was negligence or not, the determination of the matter is for the jury. It is only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw...  The Federal Reporter - Stran 4611893Celotni ogled - O knjigi
 | 1896 - 866 strani
...NEGLIGENCE — CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE. —Contributory negligence is never a question of law unless the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same inference therefrom. ( Eichhorn v. Missouri. K. & T. Ry. Co., [Mo.] 32 3. W. Rep. 993.) RAILROAD COMPANIES... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1904 - 636 strani
...that case was such as would be expected of reasonable, prudent men under a similar state of affairs. When a given state of facts is such that reasonable...that the question of negligence is ever considered as one of law for the court. ... As the question of negligence on the part of the defendant was one... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1894 - 588 strani
...instructions from the court, and whenever a given state of facts is such that reasonable men would fairly differ upon the question as to whether there was negligence or not, the question of negligence should be submitted to the jury. RAILROADS.— ACCIDENT AT CROSSING. — INSTRUCTIONS.—... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1899 - 612 strani
...personal injuries, alleged to have been caused through negligence, the facts shown by the evidence are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them, the question of negligence becomes one of law for the court. . A person, in crossing a street having... | |
 | 1894 - 2096 strani
...that case was such as -would be expected of reasonable, prudent men, under a similar state of affairs. When a given state of facts is such that reasonable...that the question of negligence Is ever considered as one of law for the court." See authorities there cited. Also Railroad Co. v. Foley, 3 CCA 589, 53... | |
 | 1894 - 2074 strani
...145 US 606, 12 Sup. Ct. 905. In Railway Co. V. Ives, 144 US 417, 12 Sup. Ct. 679, the court said : "When a given state of facts is such that reasonable...determination of the matter is for the Jury. It is only whore the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them that the question... | |
 | 1905 - 1104 strani
...case was such as would be expected of reasonably prudent men under a similar state of affairs. When u given state of facts is such that reasonable men may...negligence or not, the determination of the matter la for the jury. It is only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion... | |
 | 1899 - 2058 strani
...the duty of the court to submit it to the consideration of the jury. Where a given state of evidence is such that reasonable men may fairly differ upon...there was negligence or not. the determination of the maiter is for the jury; but where the evidence is such that all reasonable men must draw the same,... | |
 | 1893 - 2192 strani
...It is only when the facts are undisputed, and are such that reasonable men can fairly draw but one conclusion from them, that the question of negligence is ever considered one of law for the court. Railway Co. v. Ives, 144 US 409, 417, 12 Sup. Ct, Rep. 679; Railway Co. v. Converse, 139 U. 8. 469,... | |
 | 1896 - 2118 strani
...attention to the special circumstances and surroundings was a request for proper instructions. Indeed, when the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them, the question of negligence is one of law for the court. Railway Co. v. Ivés, supra. Such generalizations... | |
| |
