 Ellenborough says, if the owner of the soil throws open a passage, and neither marks by any visible distinction that he means to preserve all his rights over it, nor excludes persons from passing through it by positive prohibition, he shall be presumed...  Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah - Stran 488avtor: Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, H. Arnold Rich, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton - 1881Celotni ogled - O knjigi
 | Francis Buller - 1817 - 684 strani
...l'amp!iin,Cra. Kliz. 406. In an indictment for obstructing an highway, Elknboroiigh, CJ said, if the owner <jt a soil throws open a. passage, and neither marks by...preserve all his rights over it, nor excludes persons by positive prohibition, he slial1 be presumed to have dedicated it to the public. Rex v. Lloyd, l... | |
 | Richard Burn - 1820 - 880 strani
...dedication to tht public. By setting out a highway the owner does not part with the properly of the toil. that he means to preserve all his rights over it,...shall be presumed to have dedicated it to the public, and Unit, although the passage were originally intended for pivate convenience, when the public have... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1825 - 838 strani
...the land to the public, so far as the public have occasion for it ; ie for a right of passage. (</) If the owner of the soil throws open a passage, and...rights over it, nor excludes persons from passing over it by positive prohibition, he shall be presumed to have dedicated it to the public, (e) But proof... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1831 - 788 strani
...sufficient. Doe u. Marqiiis of Cleveland, 9 B. and C. 864. Presumption of dedication of way to the public.^ If the owner of the soil throws open a passage, and...rights over it, nor excludes persons from passing over it by positive prohibition, he shall be presumed to have dedicated it to the public ; Per Lard... | |
 | 1880 - 1042 strani
...cases are well laid down, by Lord Ellenborough, in the case of The King v. Lloyd, when he says, '.' If the owner of the soil throws open a passage, and...shall be presumed to have dedicated it to the public. Although the passage in question was originally intended only for private convenience, the public are... | |
 | Frederick Augustus Carrington, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Joseph Payne - 1833 - 668 strani
...steward is notice to the landlord." In the case of Rex v. Lloyd, 1 Camp. 260, his Lordship said, " If the owner of the soil throws open a passage, and...shall be presumed to have dedicated it to the public." But, in Roberts v. Karr, Id. 262, where a bar had been at first put up, which was soon knocked down,... | |
 | Frederick Augustus Carrington, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Joseph Payne - 1833 - 662 strani
...steward is notice to the landlord." In the case of Rex \. Lloyd, 1 Camp. 260, bis Lordship said, " If the owner of the soil throws open a passage, and...means to preserve all his rights over it, nor excludes persona from passing through it by positive prohibition, he shall be presumed to have dedicated it... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1834 - 682 strani
...steward is notice to the landlord," In the case of Rei v. Lloyd, 1 Camp. 260, his lordship said, " If the owner of the soil throws open a passage, and...-that he means to preserve all his rights over it, nor excludi-s persons from passing through it by positive prohibition, he shall be presumed to have dedicated... | |
 | Richard Burn - 1836 - 1178 strani
...Lord Ellenborough CJ, that although a place be not a thoroughfare, yet if the owner of ¡he soil throw open a passage, and neither marks by any visible distinction...shall be presumed to have dedicated it to the public, and that although the passage were originally intended for private convenience, when the public have... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), Charles Sumner - 1836 - 634 strani
...unlimited dedication to the public. In Rex v. Lloyd, 1 Campb. R. 266, the Court say : " If the owner of soil throws open a passage, and neither marks by any...rights over it, nor excludes persons from passing over United States v. Appleton. it by positive prohibition, be shall be presumed to have dedicated... | |
| |
