 In short, we are of opinion that, so far as a treaty made by the United States with any foreign nation can become the subject of judicial cognizance in the courts of this country, it is subject to such acts as Congress may pass for its enforcement, modification,...  Hearings - Stran 225avtor: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations - 1938Celotni ogled - O knjigi
 | 1885 - 544 strani
...made by the United States with any foreign nation can become the subject of judicial cognizance iu the courts of this country, it is subject to such...pass for its enforcement, modification, or repeal. Edye v. Robertson. Opinion by Miller, J . [Decided Dec. 8, 1884.] PRACTICE— WAIVER OP JURY — STIPULATION—... | |
 | 1918 - 502 strani
...States with any foreign nation, can be made the subject of judicial cognizance, in the courts of the country, it is subject to such acts as Congress may pass for its enforcement, modification or repeal."21 There is no Federal Probate Law. — The Supreme Court of the United States, in construing... | |
 | Ohio State Bar Association - 1919 - 250 strani
...the subject it held that 'so far as a treaty made by the United States with any foreign nation can be the subject of judicial cognizance in the courts of...pass for its enforcement, modification or repeal.' " In the Head Money Cases thus referred to with approval, Mr. Justice Miller had expressed the opinion... | |
 | 1888 - 1462 strani
...subject, it held that, "so far as a treaty made by the United States with any foreign nation can be the subject of judicial cognizance in the courts of...pass for its enforcement, modification, or repeal." Judgment affirmed. (124 US 19Í) KELLY v. HEDDKN, Collector.1 (January 9, 1888.) TBBATTES — WITH... | |
 | 1888 - 1450 strani
...subject, it held that, "so far as a treaty made by the United States with any foreign nation can be the subject of judicial cognizance in the courts of...pass for its enforcement, modification, or repeal." Judgment affirmed. (124 US 196) KELLY v. HEDDEN, Collector.1 (January 9, 1888.) TBEATIES— WITH DOMINICAN... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1885 - 838 strani
...participate. And such is, in fact, the case in a declaration of war, which must be made by Congress, and which, when made, usually suspends or destroys existing...pass for its enforcement, modification, or repeal. Other objections are made to this statute. Some of these relate, not to the power of Congress to pass... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1885 - 844 strani
...participate. And such is, in fact, the case in a declaration of war, which must be made by Congress, and which, when made, usually suspends or destroys existing...pass for its enforcement, modification, or repeal. Other objections are made to this statute. Some of these relate, not to the power of Congress to pass... | |
 | 1885 - 1232 strani
...participate. And such is, in fact, the case in a declaration of war, which must be made by congress, and which, when made, usually suspends or destroys existing...pass for its enforcement, modification, or repeal. Other objections are made to this statute. Some of these relate, not to the power of congress to pass... | |
 | 1885 - 544 strani
...which, when made, usually suspends or destroys existing treaties between the nations thus at war. lu short, we are of opinion that so far as a treaty made...pass for its enforcement, modification, or repeal. Edye v. íZooertíon. Opinion by Miller, J. [Decided Dec. 8, 1884.] PRACTICE— WAIVEK or JURY— STIPULATION—... | |
| |
