« PrejšnjaNaprej »
His “ Levities” are by their title exempted from the severities of criticism ; yet it
be remarked in a few words, that his humour is sometimes gross, and seldom sprightly.
Of the Moral Poems, the first is the “ Choice of “ Hercules," from Xenophon. The numbers are smooth, the diction elegant, and the thoughts just; but something of vigour is still to be wished, which it might have had by brevity and compression. His “ Fate of Delicacy” has an air of gaiety, but not a very pointed and general moral. His blank verses, those that can read them may probably find to be like the blank verses of his neighbours. “ Love and honour" is derived from the old ballad, “ Did you not hear of a Spanish Lady?”—I wish it well enough to wish it were in rhyme.
The “ School-mistress,” of which I know not what claim it has to stand among the Moral Works, is surely the most pleasing of Shenstone's perform
The adoption of a particular style, in light and short compositions, contributes much to the increase of pleasure: we are entertained at once with two imitations, of nature in the sentiments, of the original author in the style, and between them the mind is kept in perpetual employment.
The general recommendation of Shenstone is easiness and simplicity; his general defect is want of comprehension and variety. Had his mind been better stored with knowledge, whether he could have been great, I know not; he could certainly have been agreeable.
Y O UN G.
The following life, was written, at my request, by a gentleman who had beiter information than I could easily have obtained; and the public will perhaps wish that I had solicited and obtained more such favours from him.*
“ DEAR SIR, “ In consequence of our different conversations about authentic materials for the Life of Young, I send
you the following detail. “ Of great men, something must always be said to gratify curiosity. Of the illustrious author of the “ Night Thoughts,” much has been told of which there never could have been proofs; and little care appears to have been taken to tell that, of which proofs, with little trouble, might have been procured."
EDWARD YOUNG was born at Upham, near Winchester, in June 1681. He was the son of Edward Young, at that time fellow of Winchester College and rector of Upham; who was the son of Jo. Young, of Woodhay, in Berkshire, styled by Wood, gentleman. In September, 1682, the Poet's father was collated to the prebend of Gillingham Minor, in the church of Sarum, by Bishop Ward. When Ward's faculties were impaired through age, bis duties were necessarily performed by others. We learn from Wood, that, at a visitation of Sprat's, July the 12th, 1686, the prebendary preached a Latin sermon, afterwards published, with which the bishop was so pleased, that he told the chapter he was concerned to find the preacher had one of the worst prebends in their church. Some time after this, in consequence of his merit and reputation, or of the interest of Lord Bradford, to whom, in 1702, he dedicated two volumes of sermons, he was appointed chaplain to King William and Queen Mary, and preferred to the deanery of Sarum. Jacob, who wrote in 1720, says, “ he was “ chaplain and clerk of the closet to the late
* See Gent. Mag. vol. Ixx. p. 225.
queen, “ who honoured him by standing godmother to the « Poet." His fellowship of Winchester he resigned in favour of a gentleman of the name of Harris, who married his only daughter. The dean died at Sarum, after a short illness, in 1705, in the sixty-third year of his age. On the Sunday after his decease, Bishop Burnet preached at the cathedral, and began his sermon by saying, “Death has “ been of late walking round us, and making “ breach upon breach upon us, and has now car“ ried away the head of this body with a stroke; “ so that he, whom you saw a week ago distributing “ the holy mysteries, is now laid in the dust. But “ he still lives in the many excellent directions he “ has left us, both bow to live and how to die."
The Dean placed his son upon the foundation at Winchester College, where he had himself been educated. At this school Edward Young remained till the election after his eighteenth birth-day, the period at which those upon the foundation are superannuated. Whether he did not betray his abilities early in life, or his masters had not skill enough to discover in their pupil any marks of genius for which he merited reward, or no vacancy at Oxford offered them an opportunity to bestow upon him the reward provided for merit by William of Wykeham ; certain it is, that to an Oxford fellowship our poet did not succeed. By chance, or by choice, New College cannot claim the honour of numbering among its fellows him who wrote the “ Night Thoughts.”
On the 13th of October, 1703, he was entered an independent member of New College, that he might live at little expense in the Warden's lodgings, who was a particular friend of bis father's, till he should be qualified to stand for a fellowship at All Souls. In a few months the Warden of New College died. He then removed to Corpus College. The president of this society, from regard also for his father, invited him thither, in order to lessen his academical expenses. In 1708, he was nominated to a lay-fellowship at All Souls by Archbishop Tenison, into whose hands it came by devolution. Such repeated patronage, while it justifies Burnet's praise of the father, reflects credit on the conduct of the
The manner in which it was exerted seems to prove, that the father did not leave behind much wealth.
On the 23d of April, 1714, Young took his degree of bachelor of civil laws, and his doctor's degree on the 10th of June 1719.
Soon after he went to Oxford, he discovered, it is said, an inclination for pupils. Whether he ever commenced tutor is not known. None has hitherto boasted to have received his academical instruction from the author of the 56
of the “ Night Thoughts." It is probable that his College was proud of him no less as a scholar than as a poet; for in 1716, when the foundation of the Codrington Library was laid, two years after he had taken his bachelor's degree, Young was appointed to speak the Latin oration. This is at least particular for being dedicated in English “ To the Ladies of the Codrington Family." To these ladies he says, “ that he was “ unavoidably Aung into a singularity, by being
obliged to write an epistle dedicatory void of “common-place, and such a one was never pub“ lished before by any author whatever; that this
practice absolved them from any obligation of
reading what was presented to them; and that “ the bookseller approved of it, because it would “ make people stare, was absurd enough, and per
Of this oration there is no appearance in his own edition of his works; and prefixed to an edition by Curll and Tonson, 1741, is a letter from Young to Curll, if we may credit Curll, dated December the 9th, 1739, wherein he says, that he has not lei.