Unto God and Caesar: Religious Issues in the Emerging Commonwealth, 1891-1906Melbourne University Press, 1976 - 162 strani Publisher description: Should the Australian Constitution be given a religious clause or should it not? The question gave scope for almost endless wrangles to the founding fathers of Australian federation. Whether their interests were chiefly political or religious, they argued vociferously whether God should be recognized in the Preamble and whether He should appear in Section 116; and if so in what form He should be acknowledged. The issue, confused, complex and partisan enough already, was further complicated by the wider questions, first raised by Tasmanian Andrew Inglis Clark, concerning relations in general between the churches and the coming Commonwealth. This book is about the clashes between church and state groups and personalities, often mainly interested in making personal gains, what decisions they made, and how the decisions came about. |
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–3 od 35
Stran 27
... United States and Australia , ' sabbath desecrating ' Adventists had been prosecuted in the civil courts on charges of sacrilege . In Sydney in 1894 some Adventists had been sentenced to a spell in the stocks under a 1677 statute of ...
... United States and Australia , ' sabbath desecrating ' Adventists had been prosecuted in the civil courts on charges of sacrilege . In Sydney in 1894 some Adventists had been sentenced to a spell in the stocks under a 1677 statute of ...
Stran 90
... United States was a ' Christian country ' . However , accord- ing to Quick and Garran , In the debates which took place in Congress during the passage of the amending Bill , no reference appears to have been made to any religious aspect ...
... United States was a ' Christian country ' . However , accord- ing to Quick and Garran , In the debates which took place in Congress during the passage of the amending Bill , no reference appears to have been made to any religious aspect ...
Stran 95
... United States Supreme Court deem to be prohibited by the ' no establishment ' clause ? In what sense , or senses , that is , did it understand the term ' establish- ment ' ? Quick and Garran clearly take the view that it was the ' no ...
... United States Supreme Court deem to be prohibited by the ' no establishment ' clause ? In what sense , or senses , that is , did it understand the term ' establish- ment ' ? Quick and Garran clearly take the view that it was the ' no ...
Vsebina
Introduction | 1 |
Churchmen at the Bathurst Convention | 4 |
The Cardinal Steps | 13 |
Avtorske pravice | |
19 preostalih delov ni prikazanih
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
Adelaide Adye Douglas Anglican Australian Christian World Barton Bathurst cabinet campaign Cardinal ceremony churchmen clerical colonies Constitution Council of Churches CRS A6 debate declared delegates denominations draft ecclesiastical electors establishment Federal Convention federal parliament Federation Bill federation movement free exercise Geelong Glynn Gosman Higgins Higgins's clause Hopetoun Ibid imposing any religious inserted interjected interpretation issue large number leaders legislate legislatures Lord Hopetoun Lyne Melbourne ment Moran O'Connor Parliamentary perhaps petitions political prayer preamble precedence Presbyterian Presbyterian Monthly prevent primate prohibiting the free proposal Protestant Protestantism provision question Quick and Garran recognition recognitionists regard religion religious liberty religious observances religious test respect Roman Catholic Roman Catholic Church sectarian Section 116 secular secularist separationist simply South Australia South Wales South Wales Council Southern Cross Sunday observance Supreme Court Sydney Morning Herald Symon Tasmania tion United United States Constitution University of Tasmania Victorian vote Western Australia