his noble friend forfeit the favour of his sovereign by this conduct? Were his majesty's ministers lukewarm on the occasion? On the contrary, as would appear by the papers when produced, on the reception of the treaty, lord Mulgrave wrote to his noble friend, expressing his majesty's approbation of his proceedings, and declared his majesty's determination not to submit his rights of maritime war to any mediation whatever. This was during Mr. Pitt's administration. Nor was this determination concealed from the foreign ministers; for the copy of a letter of the same date from lord Mulgrave to the Russian ambassador would be produced, in which his lordship expressed similar sentiments; declared that no statesman would ever be found in this country, who would venture to unsettle that on which the power and prosperity of the country rested; and stated, that his noble friend had discharged a decided duty in the rejection of the proposition that had been made to him. Where was here the sacrifice of honour and of rights? Whatever the hon. gent. might think of other parts of his noble friend's character, they must know his candour too well to suppose that his observations on a former evening were intended for the purpose of producing, not an exculpation, but a panegyric on the conduct by which he evinced, that he was determined not to compromise that which was the solid foundation of the power of this country. He congratulated the house and the public, that such a deter- 1 mination had been evinced. He trusted t that similar principles to those which s pervaded this negotiation, would pervade / h any other negotiation in any other bands. He trusted that the great example which ta the administration of that day had set,by refusing to purchase an object, how- g ever desirable and important, by the sa i crifice of that which was not the peculiar w strength of Britain alone, but which was P the source and support of the general strength, by which that object appeared H to be attainable,ếhe trusted that that ex. ample would be followed to the end of ca time. He trusted that what we had not tu given to acquire a great good, we should fo never give even to avert a great evil. He in trusted that what we had refused to grant to th the request of friendship, would never be extorted from us by the menaces of hostility. Fo Mr. Whitbread, adverting to the personal ty, imputations that had been cast upon him с nu his noble friend forfeit the favour of his in the course of the deber, nhez sovereign by this conduct? Were bis ma- if there was any thing drzne jesty's ministers lukewarm on the occa- manner, he was sure they say sion? On the contrary, as would appear could less become any pa iu by the papers when produced, on the re-than himself, who had so ception of the treaty, lord Mulgrave wrote to assume it. As a memberi pe to his noble friend, expressing his majesty's however, he did not arrogate a approbation of his proceedings , and de- leges , and he never would lira clared his majesty's determination not to leges to be derogated from bra submit bis rights of maritime war 10 any in the most dictatorial mare mediation whatever. This was during Mr. him with being dictatorial; a Piu's administration. Nor was this de- the most arrogant manner acre termination concealed from the foreign arrogance. To the right bele ministers; for the copy of a letter of the who had treated him with wz same date from lord Mulgrave to the dom, he would say, that the es Russian ambassador would be produced, manner were levity and misteri in which his lordship expressed similar The first was manifested in ix3 sentiments; declared that no statesman which that right hon. gent proces would ever be found in this country, who and learned friend near hic ? would venture to unsettle that on which rence), one ounce of whose sich the power and prosperity of the country he would not exchange he us rested; and stated, that his noble friend gingerbread on the other side had discharged a decided duty in the re- of the second vice of his maz. jection of the proposition that had been presentation, he had giren ao made to him. Where was here the sacri- stance , by introducing a debazen fice of honour and of rights? Whatever before the papers were laid ce a the hon. gent. might think of other parts and by pronouncing a pane:7 of his noble friend's character, they must noble lord, before the house was know his candour too well to suppose that session of the means of ascerase his observations on a former evening were ther that panegyric was wella intended for the purpose of producing, ed. As to the inutility di psa not an exculpation, but a panegyric on the letter with the names suppos the conduct by which he evinced, that he would be advantageous to hare ! was determined not to compromise that that shape. The mere declaran which was the solid foundation of the power noble lord was fugitive , and covers of this country. He congratulated the made the ground of any pabeque house and the public, that such a deter- liamentary proceeding. He code mination had been evinced. He trusted the necessity under which there that similar principles to those which secretary would labour of reais pervaded this negotiation, would pervade his motion agreed to. The e any other negotiation in any other bands. calamity to the country surely se He trusted that the great example which take place; but, dreadful as it wat the administration of that day had set - owned he would rather see the rest by refusing to purchase an object, how- gent. quit office in that manner, sa ever desirable and important, by the sa- he should be turned out by the d crifice of that which was not the peculiar which lurked about the throne strength of Britain alone, but which was peated his former assertions 2.0 the source and support of the general manner in which Mr. Garlike : strength, by which that object appeared Hutchinson had been treated, at to be attainable--he trusted that that ex: some other observations , coziom purpose , while For the original motion, 50 m of its 4 Strachan, Sir R. on the State of 1300, 1315, 1329, 1368 Sugar, Distillation from, 712 Sussex Election Peliton, 1156 Sweden, Treaty with, 694 Treaty with Sweden, 694 W 410, 699, 993, 1039, 1305 1242, 1230 INDEX OF NAMES.-HOUSE OF LORDS. А Grey, Earl (late Lord Howick) 971, 1046, 1053, 1153, 1245, 161, 376, 434, 444, 641, 784, 1324, 1345 M Grosvenor, Earl, 871, 1180 Melville, Lord, 1151, 1180, 1346 н Moira, Earl, 159, 364, 441, 1047 1068, 1181 Harrowby, Lord, 363, 652, 1047, Montrose, Duke of, 642, 731, 871 153, 154, 156, 312, 313, 368, 446, 449, 656, 783, 1053, N 1076, 1079, 1087, 1148, 1941, 443, 1087 o 1349 Oxford, Bishop of, 148 R 1150, 1181, 1240, 1949, 1260, 1045, 1086, 1324, 1348 Rosslyn, Earl of, 1325 Hutchinson, Lord, 350, 443, 446 Selkirk, Earl of, 654 J Sidmouth, Lord, 13, 382, 485, 612, 661, 920,921, 1151,1179, K 1181 Spencer, Earl, 870 Stanhope, Earl, 1044 L St. John, Lord, 730, 1347 V W Wellesley, Marquis, 342 444, 473, 642, 650, 736, 871, 871, 1043, 1181, 1277, 1322 S G INDEX OF NAMES.-HOUSE OF COMMONS. Bathurst, C. B., 69, 297, 105, Canning, Mr. Secretary, 61, 93, 267, 310, 385, 387, 488, 536, 606, 613, 614, 682, 693, 695, 867, 389, 905, 1160, 1164, 1170, 1172, 1232, 1958, 1363 Castlereagh, Lord, 164, 494,786, 790, 872, 992, 911, 980, 1064, 1144 Chancellor of the Exchequer, Burdett, Sir F., 409, 410, 412, (Right Hon. Spencer Perceval) 449, 450, 456, 107, 793, 798, 71, 154, 176, 184, 188, 194, 980, 1080, 1083, 1174, 1178 231, 321, 393, 409, 413, 415, с 416, 449,454, 459, 462, 496, 698, 700, 797, 712, 719, 726, 727, 731, 758, 795, 887, 891, 1 910, 923, 926, 979, 991, 1061, 700, 720, 897, 1065, 1067, , Scott, Sir W., 1066 Secretary at War, (Sir J. Pulte- ney) 753, 797,- 990, 1082, 1124 Sharp, R., 395, 1185 Lushington, S., 414,452, 451,703, Shaw, J., 1058 728, 793, 1038, 1169 Sheridan, R.B., 72, 394,414, 454, 689, 736, 759, 869, 892, 894, м 895, 1173, 1176 Simeon, J., 1289 Smith, W., 92, 681, 792, 798, 868, 1166, 1169 Martin, H., 463, 690, 1294 Smith, J., 867 Solicitor General (Sir T. Plomer) Grant) 332 Speaker, (Right Hon. C. Abbot) 37, 191, 455, 697, 700, 725, 726, 757, 889, 894, 1160, 1171, 1252, 1306, 1517 Milton, Lord, 47, 861, 1147 Stanhope, S., 1303 Stephens, S. 1290, 1315 Sumner, G, H., 791, 1173 N T Taylor, C., 487 Nicholls, Sir J., see Advocate Ge- Taylor, M. A., 86, 790, 1169 neral Temple, Earl, 389, 411, 676, O 725, 752, 791, 886, 1147 Thornton, H., 231, 428 Thornton, S. 426, 1287 Thornton, R., 702, 1146, 1219, P 1295, 1305 Tierney, G., 178, 231, 390, 423, 405, 696, 713, 724, 726, 732, 756, 797, 839, 896,898, 1158, Perceval, s., see Chancellor of 1160, 1170, 1112, 1251, 1307, the Exchequer 1316, 1323, 1341 415, 429, 463, 682, 887, 893, Turton, Sir T., 617, 706, 1089, 1165, 1235 1287, 1360 1062, 1156 Wallace, T., 1036 Plomer, Sir T., see Solicitor Ge- Ward, J. W., 862, 1262, 1313 neral Wellesley, Sir A., 192, 410, 707, Pole, W., 411, 492, 755, 883 731, 792, 878, 1088, 1257 Pole, Sir C., 450, 460, 976, 1243 Wellesley, H., 1111, 1305 Ponsonby, G., 48, 252, 309, 557, Whitbread, S., 58, 93, 98,302, 611, 613, 615,*694, 722, 750, 385, 395, 414, 601, 614, 617, 756, 856, 879, 888, 892, 926, 709, 726, 729, 731, 789, 793, 801, 892, 896, 911, 978, 984, 1060, 1064, 1147, 1162, 1166, 1168, 1182, 1231, 1258, 1812, Price, Sir C., 309, 732, 1060, 1367 1168 Wilberforce, W., 730, 860, 1238, War Windham, W., 69, 90, 170, 288, 337, 394, 411, 493, 537, 704, R 749, 754, 758, 909, 1065, 1084, 1360 Rose, G., 162, 163, 186, 187, Wood, T., 792 462, 678, 697, 722, 893, 924, Wortley, S., 1215 Wynne, C., 1158, 1306 S Y Yorke, C., 88 W END OF VOL. X. Frict by 'T. CURSON HANSARD, Peterborough court, FLELT STRELT, |