 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 802 strani
...To justify the State in interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must be made to appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...a particular class, require such interference and that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose and are not unduly oppressive... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 strani
...601), Justice Brown, after denning in general language the term "police power of the State," said: 11 To justify the State in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, )<V.s7, that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class,... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1920 - 684 strani
...authorities in interfering with the rights and privileges of the owners of property it must appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...of a particular class, require such interference. 3. SAME — laws in exercise of police power are subject to supervision of courts. Laws enacted in... | |
 | 1894 - 922 strani
...necessary for the protection of such interests. Barbier v. Connolly, 113 US 27; Kidd v. Pearson, 128 id. 1. To justify the State in thus interposing its authority...purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals. The Legislature may not, under the guise of protecting the public interests, arbitrarily interfere... | |
 | 1901 - 510 strani
...necessary for the protection of such interests, subject, of course, to the restrictions that it must appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...particular class, require such interference ; and that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose and not unduly oppressive... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1911 - 662 strani
...exercise of police power. This rule was approved and applied in Phillips v. State, 77 Ohio St., 214, "To justify the state in thus interposing its authority...purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals. The legislature may not, under guise of protecting, arbitrarily interfere with private business or... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1905 - 660 strani
...nuisances and may be summarily destroyed by any person, will bear the test of the second rule, namely, "that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment...purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals." In the determination of that question the value of the property was a very proper matter for consideration.... | |
 | 1920 - 516 strani
...Business. — To Justify the state in Interfering with the conduct of a lawful business, it must appear that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished...a particular class, require such interference, and that the means are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1904 - 636 strani
...abridgment." So, in Lawton v. Steele, 152 US 133, 14 Sup. Ct. 499, 38 L. Ed. 385, Mr. Justice Brown said : "To justify the State in thus interposing its authority...such interference; and, second, that the means are reasonable for the accomplishment of the purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals. The .Legislature... | |
 | R. H. Andrews - 1899 - 422 strani
...incapacity, as well as deception and fraud." In the case of Lawton vs. Steel, Justice Brown said : "To justify the state in thus interposing its authority...purpose, and not unduly oppressive upon individuals. The legislature may not, under the guise of protecting the public interests, arbitrarily interfere... | |
| |
To justify the State in thus interposing its authority in behalf of the public, it must appear, first, that the interests of the public generally, as distinguished from those of a particular class, require such interference; and, second, that the means... 
