David's Hammer: The Case for an Activist Judiciary

Sprednja platnica
Cato Institute, 2007 - 188 strani
Judicial activism is condemned by both right and left, for good reason--lawless courts are a threat to republican government. But challenging conventional wisdom, constitutional litigator Clint Bolick argues in David's Hammer: The Case for an Activist Judiciary that far worse is a judiciary that allows the other branches of government to run roughshod over precious liberties. For better or worse, only a vigorous judiciary can enforce the limits on executive and legislative action, protect constitution-al rights, and tame unelected bureaucrats. David's Hammer reclaims for the judiciary its intended role as the ultimate safeguard of a free society.
 

Mnenja - Napišite recenzijo

Na običajnih mestih nismo našli nobenih recenzij.

Vsebina

II
1
III
19
IV
35
V
49
VI
69
VII
87
VIII
97
IX
113
X
127
XI
139
XII
157
XIII
165
XIV
179
Avtorske pravice

Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse

Pogosti izrazi in povedi

Bibliografski podatki