Use of Rule 12(b)(6) in Two Federal District CourtsFederal Judicial Center, 1989 - 19 strani |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
1988 Terminations 4th Cir Advisory Committee antitrust Central California Civil Procedure claim for relief CLRP study complaint Connolly and Lombard Court Northern District court of appeals Courts Federal Judicial decisions dismiss for failure disposition rate dispositions in Maryland District Courts Federal District of Maryland District of Pennsylvania Eastern District Eastern Pennsylvania Effect of Rule empirical established legal theory fact pleading Federal District Courts Federal Judicial Center Federal Rules final disposition H Street involving Rule 12(b)(6 issue led to final Massachusetts merits motion led Motions on Dispositions Motions to dismiss motions were filed Nature of Suit percentage personal injury Prisoner Civil Rights prisoner petitions Product Liability Professor Carrington rate of filing recent cases illustrating revolving door Rule 11 sanctions Rule 12 Draft Rule 56 Rules of Civil rulings granted dismissal Sample of 1988 summary judgment supra note Table 20 tion Total Dispositions Defendants Total Granted Total in Sample Willging
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 17 - In appraising the sufficiency of a complaint we follow, of course, the accepted rule that a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.
Stran 15 - In all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity. Malice, intent, knowledge, and other condition of mind of a person may be averred generally.
Stran 6 - Recommended Procedures for Handling Prisoner Civil Rights Cases in the Federal Courts (Federal Judicial Center, 1980).
Stran 4 - A. Miller, The August 1983 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Promoting Effective Case Management and Lawyer Responsibility, 7-9 (Federal Judicial Center, 1984).
Stran 17 - The rules of pleading require that the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity. Bradley v. Chiron Corp., 136 F.3d 1370, 45 USPQ2d 1819 (Fed. Cir. 1998). This case contains a nice discussion of the elements required, under California law, for rescission of a settlement agreement on grounds of mistake or fraud, and also how those elements must be pleaded in a federal complaint.