The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human RightsBloomsbury Publishing, 20. jun. 2013 - 362 strani After more than 30 years of discussion, negotiations between the Council of Europe and the European Union on the EU's accession to the European Convention on Human Rights have resulted in a Draft Accession Agreement. This will allow the EU to accede to the Convention within the next couple of years. As a consequence, the Union will become subject to the external judicial supervision of an international treaty regime. Individuals will also be entitled to submit applications against the Union, alleging that their fundamental rights have been violated by legal acts rooted in EU law, directly to the Strasbourg Court. As the first comprehensive monograph on this topic, this book examines the concerns for the EU's legal system in relation to accession and the question of whether and how accession and the system of human rights protection under the Convention can be effectively reconciled with the autonomy of EU law. It also takes into account how this objective can be attained without jeopardising the current system of individual human rights protection under the Convention. The main chapters deal with the legal status and rank of the Convention and the Accession Agreement within Union law after accession; the external review of EU law by Strasbourg and the potential subordination of the Luxembourg Court; the future of individual applications and the so-called co-respondent mechanism; the legal arrangement of inter-party cases after accession and the presumable clash of jurisdictions between Strasbourg and Luxembourg; and the interplay between the Convention's subsidiarity principle (the exhaustion of local remedies) and the prior involvement of the Luxembourg Court in EU-related cases. The analysis presented in this book comes at a crucial point in the history of European human rights law, offering a holistic and detailed enquiry into the EU's accession to the ECHR and how this move can be reconciled with the autonomy of EU law. |
Vsebina
3 | |
13 | |
Part II The Autonomy of European Union Law
versus International Law and Courts | 17 |
3 The Notion of Legal Autonomy | 19 |
4 The EU and International Courts
and Tribunals | 31 |
The Court of Justice
of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights | 50 |
An Anticipating
Assessment for Accession | 82 |
Reconciling Accession and Autonomy | 87 |
10 InterParty Cases after Accession | 174 |
11 The Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies
and the Prior Involvement of the
Luxembourg Court | 209 |
Part IV Conclusions and Outlook | 257 |
Revisiting and Answering the Research Question | 259 |
A Summary of Findings | 261 |
14 Outlook and Future Perspectives | 278 |
Appendix | 281 |
312 | |
7 The Status of the Accession Agreement and the Convention after Accession | 89 |
A Hierarchy of Courts? | 113 |
Introducing the CoRespondent Mechanism | 138 |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights Paul Gragl Omejen predogled - 2014 |
The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights Paul Gragl Predogled ni na voljo - 2012 |
The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights Paul Gragl Predogled ni na voljo - 2013 |
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
according action alleged violation amended application Article 263 become Charter CJEU CJEU’s Commission Committee Community competence complaints concerning consequently considered Constitutional Convention on Human Council Council of Europe course Court of Justice decide decision directed domestic Draft Accession Agreement ECHR ECtHR effective ensure EU law EU’s Europäischen European Commission European Convention European Union law examined exclusive jurisdiction exhaust external fact functioning fundamental rights given High Contracting Parties Human Rights implementing individual institutions inter-party international court international law interpretation Ireland issue Italy judgment judicial legal order legislation limit Lock Luxembourg Court means Member Moreover necessary obligations Opinion para paragraph paras powers preserve primary law principle prior involvement procedure proceedings protection Protocol provisions question reference regard relating remedies request requirements respect responsible result rights protection ruling situation specific Strasbourg Court TFEU tion Treaty tribunal Union’s legal autonomy United Kingdom violation