 | Medical and Chirurgical Faculty of the State of Maryland - 1896 - 678 strani
...justice of the Supreme Court that "The office of the trade-mark is to point out distinctly the origin of ownership of the article to which it is affixed; or, in other words, to give notice as to who was the producer." These decisions would appear to the lay mind to be sufficiently distinct... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1871 - 756 strani
...element, are not appropriable as trade-marks. 1. To constitute a private trade-mark, it must denote either the origin or ownership of the article to which it is affixed. (Upton on Trade-marks, 86. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. Spear, 2 Sandf. 599. Fetridge v. Wells, 13... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1872 - 1546 strani
...were not employed to designate the same, or like articles of production. The office of a trade-mark is to point out distinctively the origin, or ownership...may, in many cases, be done by a name, a mark, or a device well known, but not previously applied to the same article. But though it is not necessary that... | |
 | Austin Abbott - 1872 - 576 strani
...element, are not applicable as trademarks. First. To constitute a private trademark, it must denote either the origin or ownership of the article to which it is affixed (Upton on Trade i/i., 80; Anioskeag Mannf. Co. v. Spear, 2 Sand/., 599; Fetridge v. •Wells, 13 How.... | |
 | William Henry Browne - 1873 - 720 strani
...rule has been frequently enunciated, and settled beyond question, viz.: The office of a trade-mark is to point out distinctively the origin or ownership...other words, to give notice who was the producer. § 145. The difficulty is this: What does distinctively indicate such origin or ownership ? That question... | |
 | Charles Sidney Whitman - 1875 - 814 strani
...were not employed to designate the same, or like articles of production. The office of a trademark is to point out distinctively the origin, or ownership...may, in many cases, be done by a name, a mark, or a device well known, but not previously applied to the same article. But though it is not necessary that... | |
 | Appleton Morgan - 1875 - 840 strani
...to give a right to the exclusive use of it. The ofSce of a trade-mark is to point distinctively to the origin or ownership of the article to which it is affixed. Marks which only indicate the names or qualities of products cannot become the subjects of exclusive... | |
 | Jabez S. Holmes - 1877 - 596 strani
...not within the protection of the copyright. The office of a trade-mark is to point distinctively to the origin or ownership of the article to which it is affixed. Where a trade-mark right is invaded, the essence of the wrong consists in the sale of the goods of... | |
 | 1896 - 2118 strani
...Ludeling, 22 Fed. 826. In Canal Co. v. Clark, 13 Wall. 322, the court said: "The office of a trade-mark is to point out distinctively the origin or ownership...may, in many cases, be done by a name, a mark, or a device well known, but not previously applied to the same article." The defendant is not charged with... | |
 | 1881 - 956 strani
...protection." In the case of Canal Co. v. Clark, 13 Wall. 322, it is stated that the— "Office of a trade-mark is to point out distinctively the origin or ownership...other words, to give notice who was the producer." And that there are some limits to the right of selection will be manifest. It is farther said, in that... | |
| |
STRONG, speaking for the court, that "the office of a trade-mark is to point out distinctively the origin or ownership of the article to which it is affixed ; or, in other words, to give notice who was the producer. 
