Digest of Certain Supreme Court Decisions Pertinent to the Proposed Western Water Rights Settlement Act (S. 863) and State-Federal Water ProblemsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1958 - 34 strani |
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–5 od 5
Stran 3
... affirmed by the Montana Supreme Court , on the ground of a failure to comply with certain Montana statutes . Those statutes contained regulations concerning the location of mining claims which were in addition to those prescribed by ...
... affirmed by the Montana Supreme Court , on the ground of a failure to comply with certain Montana statutes . Those statutes contained regulations concerning the location of mining claims which were in addition to those prescribed by ...
Stran 7
... affirmed ( p . 440 ) . B. NAVIGATION 1. Cooley v . Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia ( 12 How . 299 ( 1851 ) ) was a case of pilotage in navigable waters . In 1789 Con- gress passed a law ( 1 Stat . 54 ) declaring that all ...
... affirmed ( p . 440 ) . B. NAVIGATION 1. Cooley v . Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia ( 12 How . 299 ( 1851 ) ) was a case of pilotage in navigable waters . In 1789 Con- gress passed a law ( 1 Stat . 54 ) declaring that all ...
Stran 9
... affirmed of laws for the regulation of pilots and pilotage is plain . The act of 1789 contains a clear and authortiative declaration by the First Congress , that the nature of this subject is such , that until Congress should find it ...
... affirmed of laws for the regulation of pilots and pilotage is plain . The act of 1789 contains a clear and authortiative declaration by the First Congress , that the nature of this subject is such , that until Congress should find it ...
Stran 10
... affirmed by the United States Court of Ap- peals for the District of Columbia ( 151 F. 2d 20 ) but was reversed by the Supreme Court . The focal point was section 9 ( b ) ( 16 U. S. Č . 802 ( b ) which reads : Sic . 9. That each ...
... affirmed by the United States Court of Ap- peals for the District of Columbia ( 151 F. 2d 20 ) but was reversed by the Supreme Court . The focal point was section 9 ( b ) ( 16 U. S. Č . 802 ( b ) which reads : Sic . 9. That each ...
Stran 26
... affirmed by the United States Supreme Court . As in the Knickerbocker case , the United States Supreme Court , in- effect , held that article III , section 2 , of the Constitution of the United States not only gave the Federal ...
... affirmed by the United States Supreme Court . As in the Knickerbocker case , the United States Supreme Court , in- effect , held that article III , section 2 , of the Constitution of the United States not only gave the Federal ...
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
act of Congress action actual appropriation affirmed amended applicable appropriation of water Assimilative Crimes Act authority beneficial purposes canal Central Valley project Chandler-Dunbar commerce clause Commodore Park common-law rule compensation conformity congressional constitutional power construction construed decision declared delegate Deschutes River Desert Land Act ditches diversion effect enacted exclusive legislation exercise existing rights Federal Power Act Federal Power Commission flow Friant Dam grant interests Interior interstate commerce Iowa irrigation issued jurisdiction Justice landowners legislative power license limitation McCarran Act ment mining nature navigable streams navigation servitude North Platte project obstruction Oregon ownership permit pilots police power power of Congress power to regulate prior prohibition property right public domain public lands question Reclamation Act recognized regulate commerce require respect riparian rights river Secretary Stat statutes subject to existing supra Supreme Court held tion unappropriated water United valid vested rights water rights became waterpower Wyoming