Digest of Certain Supreme Court Decisions Pertinent to the Proposed Western Water Rights Settlement Act (S. 863) and State-Federal Water ProblemsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1958 - 34 strani |
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–5 od 6
Stran 10
... claiming that the cooperative should also present satis- factory evidence of its compliance with Iowa law , and a permit from the State Executive Council of Iowa for the same project . Iowa statutory policy , as interpreted by the State ...
... claiming that the cooperative should also present satis- factory evidence of its compliance with Iowa law , and a permit from the State Executive Council of Iowa for the same project . Iowa statutory policy , as interpreted by the State ...
Stran 13
... claimed the assessed dam- ages for this should have been $ 3,450,000 . The two questions for decision , according to Justice Lurton , were : ( 1 ) Whether the com- pany had any private property in the waterpower capacity of the rapids ...
... claimed the assessed dam- ages for this should have been $ 3,450,000 . The two questions for decision , according to Justice Lurton , were : ( 1 ) Whether the com- pany had any private property in the waterpower capacity of the rapids ...
Stran 14
... claimed compensable as riparian rights . The United States appears to have willingly compensated some riparian owners for similar losses of floodwaters on their grasslands but refused to compensate others , including Gerlach ...
... claimed compensable as riparian rights . The United States appears to have willingly compensated some riparian owners for similar losses of floodwaters on their grasslands but refused to compensate others , including Gerlach ...
Stran 16
... claimed by respondent except to recognize that they are usufructuary rights to use the water for the generation of power , as distinguished from claims to the legal ownership of the running water itself . They are rights to use the ...
... claimed by respondent except to recognize that they are usufructuary rights to use the water for the generation of power , as distinguished from claims to the legal ownership of the running water itself . They are rights to use the ...
Stran 26
... claimed that certain diversions violated the rule of priority . Both States , however , asked for an equitable apportionment . The factual situation is not important in this instance . The de- cision , in effect , enunciated the ...
... claimed that certain diversions violated the rule of priority . Both States , however , asked for an equitable apportionment . The factual situation is not important in this instance . The de- cision , in effect , enunciated the ...
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
act of Congress action actual appropriation affirmed amended applicable appropriation of water Assimilative Crimes Act authority beneficial purposes canal Central Valley project Chandler-Dunbar commerce clause Commodore Park common-law rule compensation conformity congressional constitutional power construction construed decision declared delegate Deschutes River Desert Land Act ditches diversion effect enacted exclusive legislation exercise existing rights Federal Power Act Federal Power Commission flow Friant Dam grant interests Interior interstate commerce Iowa irrigation issued jurisdiction Justice landowners legislative power license limitation McCarran Act ment mining nature navigable streams navigation servitude North Platte project obstruction Oregon ownership permit pilots police power power of Congress power to regulate prior prohibition property right public domain public lands question Reclamation Act recognized regulate commerce require respect riparian rights river Secretary Stat statutes subject to existing supra Supreme Court held tion unappropriated water United valid vested rights water rights became waterpower Wyoming