Digest of Certain Supreme Court Decisions Pertinent to the Proposed Western Water Rights Settlement Act (S. 863) and State-Federal Water ProblemsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1958 - 34 strani |
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–5 od 12
Stran 9
... construction , given from time to time by this court , after the most deliberate consideration , to hold that the mere grant of such a power to Congress , did not imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power ; that it is ...
... construction , given from time to time by this court , after the most deliberate consideration , to hold that the mere grant of such a power to Congress , did not imply a prohibition on the States to exercise the same power ; that it is ...
Stran 10
... construction of the project by refusing a State permit , the Supreme Court said that to require the cooperative to secure the actual grant to it of such a per- mit under State law , as a condition precedent to securing a Federal Ecense ...
... construction of the project by refusing a State permit , the Supreme Court said that to require the cooperative to secure the actual grant to it of such a per- mit under State law , as a condition precedent to securing a Federal Ecense ...
Stran 13
... construction in or over any such river is or is not a hindrance to navigation is conclusive . " Such judgment and determination is the exercise of legislative power in respect of a subject wholly within its control " ( pp . 63 , 64 ) ...
... construction in or over any such river is or is not a hindrance to navigation is conclusive . " Such judgment and determination is the exercise of legislative power in respect of a subject wholly within its control " ( pp . 63 , 64 ) ...
Stran 14
... construction of Friant Dam and the consequent taking of San Joaquin water rights had no purpose or effect except irrigation and reclamation ( p . 731 ) . The Supreme Court noted that the earliest congressional legislation on the Central ...
... construction of Friant Dam and the consequent taking of San Joaquin water rights had no purpose or effect except irrigation and reclamation ( p . 731 ) . The Supreme Court noted that the earliest congressional legislation on the Central ...
Stran 17
... construction of a dam for multiple purposes , one of which was improvement of navigation , As to the need for this improvement , the Court said it would not sub- stitute its judgment for that of Congress , citing Arizona V. Cal ( 1931 ) ...
... construction of a dam for multiple purposes , one of which was improvement of navigation , As to the need for this improvement , the Court said it would not sub- stitute its judgment for that of Congress , citing Arizona V. Cal ( 1931 ) ...
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
act of Congress action actual appropriation affirmed amended applicable appropriation of water Assimilative Crimes Act authority beneficial purposes canal Central Valley project Chandler-Dunbar commerce clause Commodore Park common-law rule compensation conformity congressional constitutional power construction construed decision declared delegate Deschutes River Desert Land Act ditches diversion effect enacted exclusive legislation exercise existing rights Federal Power Act Federal Power Commission flow Friant Dam grant interests Interior interstate commerce Iowa irrigation issued jurisdiction Justice landowners legislative power license limitation McCarran Act ment mining nature navigable streams navigation servitude North Platte project obstruction Oregon ownership permit pilots police power power of Congress power to regulate prior prohibition property right public domain public lands question Reclamation Act recognized regulate commerce require respect riparian rights river Secretary Stat statutes subject to existing supra Supreme Court held tion unappropriated water United valid vested rights water rights became waterpower Wyoming