Digest of Certain Supreme Court Decisions Pertinent to the Proposed Western Water Rights Settlement Act (S. 863) and State-Federal Water ProblemsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1958 - 34 strani |
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–5 od 7
Stran 4
... destroys the Constitution *** ( pp . 330-332 ) . 4. Kentucky Whip and Collar Co. v . Illinois Central Railroad Co. ( 299 U. S. 334 ) ( 1937 ) was an application of the Ashurst - Summers Act which sought to assist States , in protecting ...
... destroys the Constitution *** ( pp . 330-332 ) . 4. Kentucky Whip and Collar Co. v . Illinois Central Railroad Co. ( 299 U. S. 334 ) ( 1937 ) was an application of the Ashurst - Summers Act which sought to assist States , in protecting ...
Stran 15
... destroy riparian interests without reimburse- ment where no navigation purpose existed . Since we do not agree that Congress intended to invoke its navigation servitude as to each and every one of this group of coordinated projects , we ...
... destroy riparian interests without reimburse- ment where no navigation purpose existed . Since we do not agree that Congress intended to invoke its navigation servitude as to each and every one of this group of coordinated projects , we ...
Stran 22
... destroy the right of the United States as the owner of lands bordering on a stream to the continued flow of its waters , so far at least as might be necessary for the beneficial uses of the Government property . ( 2 ) A State is limited ...
... destroy the right of the United States as the owner of lands bordering on a stream to the continued flow of its waters , so far at least as might be necessary for the beneficial uses of the Government property . ( 2 ) A State is limited ...
Stran 23
... destroy the navigability of that watercourse in derogation of the interests of all the people of the United States , is a construction which cannot be tolerated * * * . The Court further said that section 10 of the act of September 19 ...
... destroy the navigability of that watercourse in derogation of the interests of all the people of the United States , is a construction which cannot be tolerated * * * . The Court further said that section 10 of the act of September 19 ...
Stran 24
... destroy their naviga- bility , is to carry those statutes beyond what their fair import permits . This legislation must be interpreted in the light of existing facts - that all through this mining region in the West were streams , not ...
... destroy their naviga- bility , is to carry those statutes beyond what their fair import permits . This legislation must be interpreted in the light of existing facts - that all through this mining region in the West were streams , not ...
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
act of Congress action actual appropriation affirmed amended applicable appropriation of water Assimilative Crimes Act authority beneficial purposes canal Central Valley project Chandler-Dunbar commerce clause Commodore Park common-law rule compensation conformity congressional constitutional power construction construed decision declared delegate Deschutes River Desert Land Act ditches diversion effect enacted exclusive legislation exercise existing rights Federal Power Act Federal Power Commission flow Friant Dam grant interests Interior interstate commerce Iowa irrigation issued jurisdiction Justice landowners legislative power license limitation McCarran Act ment mining nature navigable streams navigation servitude North Platte project obstruction Oregon ownership permit pilots police power power of Congress power to regulate prior prohibition property right public domain public lands question Reclamation Act recognized regulate commerce require respect riparian rights river Secretary Stat statutes subject to existing supra Supreme Court held tion unappropriated water United valid vested rights water rights became waterpower Wyoming